<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Year of the Geek &#187; Hardware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yearofthegeek.net/category/tech/hardware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yearofthegeek.net</link>
	<description>More like 25 Years, but this is easier.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:16:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Next, on YOTG.</title>
		<link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/11/next-on-yotg/</link>
		<comments>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/11/next-on-yotg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahlman IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new purchase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xserve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearofthegeek.net/?p=483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has finally happened.  My lab has finally gotten the funds to upgrade our aging G5 servers with nice, new, shiny Mac Mini's and a Promise Pegasus RAID.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has finally happened.  My lab has finally gotten the funds to upgrade our aging G5 servers with nice, new, shiny Mac Mini&#8217;s and a Promise Pegasus RAID.</p>
<p>Currently, <a title="BxMC" href="http://bxmc.poly.edu" target="_blank">the lab I run</a> has 10 Mac Pro desktop&#8217;s all running into a 6 year old G5 Xserve and Apple RAID.  The RAID uses 14 IDE drives that are basically maxed out.  We have about 4TB of storage on 14 drives..this is very sad.  Our G5 servers are not upgradable anymore, and we have limitations on the types of things we can serve on them.  They have lasted us this long, but it&#8217;s time to finally phase them out.</p>
<p>In the next 2-3 weeks I&#8217;ll be replacing our two G5 servers and our RAID with two Mac Mini servers and the Promise Thunderbolt RAID.  The servers will give us huge boost in performance and the RAID will bump us to 12TB of storage.  This will not be an easy task as our current systems all run 10.5 and the new servers run 10.7.  I will also have to migrate all of the user accounts and data to the new system without losing anything. Instead of removing our old servers I will use them only as basic servers; MySQL, Apache, Xgrid controllers, etc.  I&#8217;m also going to use them as tertiary backups for our user accounts and servers (backing up the new machines and user accounts to the RAID once per week).</p>
<p>Over the next few posts I will attempt to document the migration.  I&#8217;ll start with initial setup then go to migrating data/accounts then end with the final phase out process.  I hope that the next few entries may help people who get into a similar situation as well as keep a record for myself on any problems I might face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/11/next-on-yotg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>That didn&#8217;t last as long as I was expecting&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/that-didnt-last-as-long-as-i-was-expecting/</link>
		<comments>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/that-didnt-last-as-long-as-i-was-expecting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahlman IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyanogenmod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new purchase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearofthegeek.net/?p=436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I decided to upgrade to the Thunderbolt after all.  Main reason: I got $50 off from a web coupon.  I'm going to write a little bit about it after I've used it a bit more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I decided to upgrade to the Thunderbolt after all.  Main reason: I got $50 off from a web coupon.  I&#8217;m going to write a little bit about it after I&#8217;ve used it a bit more.</p>
<p>Some first impressions: This thing is super fast, it&#8217;s got a nice feeling to it (not as solid as my DROID but still pretty well built), and the screen is really really nice.  The battery life isn&#8217;t as bad as everyone says it it&#8230;I got a full day out of it with fairly heavy use&#8230;we&#8217;ll see if that continues though.  I hate SenseUI&#8230;so I replaced it with ADW Launcher right away and I&#8217;m waiting for CyanogenMod to come out for it (it&#8217;s currently being worked on).  So expect some sort of review in the coming days/weeks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/that-didnt-last-as-long-as-i-was-expecting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting more from my Original DROID (Part 2: Restoring and Troubleshooting)</title>
		<link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/getting-more-from-my-original-droid-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/getting-more-from-my-original-droid-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahlman IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyanogenmod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DROID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearofthegeek.net/?p=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In part 1 I described (in little detail) how I rooted my phone and installed CyanogenMod 7 on it to get some more mileage out of it until I upgrade to a newer device this year.  But of course every upgrade and every hack isn&#8217;t without it&#8217;s issues and every hack isn&#8217;t perfect at all.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a title="Getting more from my Original DROID (Part 1:Rooting and CM7)" href="http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/getting-more-from-my-original-droid-1/">part 1</a> I described (in little detail) how I rooted my phone and installed CyanogenMod 7 on it to get some more mileage out of it until I upgrade to a newer device this year.  But of course every upgrade and every hack isn&#8217;t without it&#8217;s issues and every hack isn&#8217;t perfect at all.  Cyanogen never claims to be 100% trouble-free, and every users&#8217; experience will vary depending on device and applications installed; after all, it is technically a hack made by third-party developers&#8230;and no developer is perfect. The methods for flashing are also different for each user.</p>
<p>I installed CM7 when it was at RC1 for the DROID (still buggy, but still good for everyday use) and I originally flashed my phone by doing a factory reset of the device (removes everything) and then installing the ROM. This gave me an endless boot screen.  What I had to do to fix this was not only do a factory reset, but wipe the cache partition AND the Dalvik cache partition.  This was easy with the ClockworkMod and it was also nearly 100% risk free since I had a complete Nandroid backup.  After wiping the two it booted successfully!</p>
<p>I noticed that in Android 2.3 Google will restore all of your previously purchased and downloaded apps if you want it to automatically on a new device (only the app itself, not the data..like game save data).  This is great, but I already decided to use MyBackup Root for this, mainly because I wanted to have my stuff there with all of the data.  So i just told the phone not to download everything and I&#8217;ll just restore everything from my backup.  What this left me with was broken installed apps with no way to update them because the Market links were all hosed.  This sucked, now what was I supposed to do?  I decided to flash again and allow Google to push the apps to my phone.  This process took some time but everything was downloaded for the most part; unfortunately, I didn&#8217;t have my app data, so all of my game data and all of my settings were gone&#8230;I check MyBackup and sure enough I was able to restore data only!  I did that and bingo, everything worked again with all of my old data!  A few apps needed to be reinstalled or needed their data wiped (Google maps and Facebook I think) but for the most part everything worked just as it was supposed to.</p>
<div id="attachment_424" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 178px"><a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Restore.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-424" title="MyBackup Root restore" src="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Restore-168x300.png" alt="" width="168" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Choose which to restore? Yay!</p></div>
<p>So now that I had my apps on my phone, I was nearing happiness with my hacked DROID.  I say nearing because I was still having many issues with other things.  I won&#8217;t go into every little one but I will talk about the two that almost made me decide to go back to stock.</p>
<h3>LED Notifications</h3>
<p>The one thing I love about Android phones is the LED notifications.  A simple little LED in the corner of my phone blinks different colors for certain things (texts, emails, etc) so I don&#8217;t need to turn the screen on, or unlock my phone to see what I missed or see what that beep was from&#8230;I can just look at the color of the LED.  Funny thing happened after installing, it stopped working.  I would look down and nothing would be blinking but when I unlocked my phone I&#8217;d notice an e-mail that I missed!  What was going on here?  I looked in the settings and found that CM has basically rewritten the notification system and you can customize colors and blink rate from it if you so desired, but instead it broke the damn thing.  This wouldn&#8217;t fly with me, I was about to go back to stock because one of my favorite features was broken&#8230;then I found the forums.  I searched the issue on the forums and found a lot of people with the same issue, on different phones even!  Reading through many of the posts they all usually came around to the same solution, un-check everything in the LED settings then check them again then hit &#8220;Reset all LED notifications&#8221; and reboot. And it worked!  I had my LED back and working and now it was even better because I can change the settings for every program and even change the colors and blink rate for them, pretty neat.</p>
<div id="attachment_426" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 178px"><a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/ledprogramsett.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-426" title="LED Program Settings" src="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/ledprogramsett-168x300.png" alt="" width="168" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Change color and rate for LED notifications</p></div>
<h3>Missing Messages</h3>
<p>Now that my LED notifications worked I was happy that I could look down and see if I missed any emails or (more importantly) text messages&#8230;but strangely I felt that I was receiving less messages.  I went an entire day without a text message, which is very odd for me actually.  I looked at my phone, no blinking LED, I unlocked the phone, no notification in the menu, I opened the messaging app and boom, new texts, some as old as a day!  What the hell was going on with this?  I&#8217;m missing text messages now?  This used to happen with my <a title="Cell Phone Fussing" href="http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/01/cell-phone-fussing/">EnV Touch</a>, never my DROID!  I tried resetting my notifications for the app, and it would work for a while after I opened the app.  I figured, okay, it&#8217;s fixed, but then it would stop later on in the day.  I was getting very frustrated with this now and was again thinking about going back to stock.  I hit the forums again and found one post about the issue with one simple solution:</p>
<div id="attachment_427" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 237px"><a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/message-app-check.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-427" title="Message App checkbox" src="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/message-app-check-227x300.png" alt="" width="227" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The solution! Check that box!</p></div>
<p>Once I checked that, never missed another message.  It locks the message app in the memory so it&#8217;s always running.  Sure it uses up memory, but my messages are more important to me than the amount of apps I can run at one time.</p>
<p><em>Side note: But why does the DROID do this with CM7?  The DROID has 256MB RAM, this was a lot when the phone came out and with 2.1 it was fine.  Once 2.2 was released memory was becoming a problem for the phone.  The phone had trouble even keeping the Home app in memory; if you ran a program that was memory hungry and went back to the home screen you&#8217;d have to wait for it to redraw because Android&#8217;s memory management would kill it.  So in CM7 you can see the two check boxes for home and messaging, this stoped the redrawing(relaunching) and the missing messages&#8230;but it took some memory away of course which means you can only do so much multitasking before apps start getting killed.  Android 2.3.3 uses more memory, and the DROID just doesn&#8217;t have that much&#8230;so CM7 also allows asset purging to free up RAM as well as compucache (memory compression).  These use a little CPU but allow you to multitask fairly well;  it&#8217;s nowhere near as good as other newer phones, but it works.</em></p>
<p>There were some other small odds and ends that I had fixed by tweaking settings and installing updates but I thought that these two were really the most damming for me.  I managed to fix them with help from other nerds at the <a title="CyanogenMod Forums" href="http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/">CyanogenMod Forums</a> who were running into similar issues and there are some I managed to fix by trial and error.  Now, he ROM still has it&#8217;s occasional reboots and hiccups (not very often) and they usually happen with two programs; Google Maps and the Camera app, but these crashes happen less and less with each update.</p>
<p>CM7 is now out of RC and was released as Gold&#8230;but not for the DROID yet.  It still is very much a work in progress, but the progress is going very quickly, and I really like the direction it&#8217;s heading.  They&#8217;ve managed to give DROID users Android 2.3 even after Motorola decided it &#8220;wouldn&#8217;t work&#8221; on the phone.  Well, it is working (for the most part) and I&#8217;m fairly happy with it.  It has really allowed me to use my phone a bit longer than I was expecting.  I&#8217;m probably going to wait until August to upgrade my phone instead of going for the Thunderbolt, but time may change that.  What I do know is that my phone still works well and I will get more time out of it because of the ROMS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/getting-more-from-my-original-droid-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting more from my Original DROID (Part 1:Rooting and CM7)</title>
		<link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/getting-more-from-my-original-droid-1/</link>
		<comments>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/getting-more-from-my-original-droid-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahlman IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DROID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearofthegeek.net/?p=409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love my DROID, I have since I got it over a year ago.  But in a year, a lot can happen with technology of course.  My phone was originally equipped with Android 2.1 (the first phone to have it actually) and had an ARM 600MHz processor (underclocked to 550 for battery life), and 256MB [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love my <a title="Cell Phone Fussing" href="http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/01/cell-phone-fussing/">DROID</a>, I have since I got it over a year ago.  But in a year, a lot can happen with technology of course.  My phone was originally equipped with Android 2.1 (the first phone to have it actually) and had an ARM 600MHz processor (underclocked to 550 for battery life), and 256MB RAM.  It was fast, really fast&#8230;and it took a while for phones to be that fast&#8230;but it didn&#8217;t last long.  Soon after the DROID came out every new phone that came out just got faster and faster very quickly..I mean, that&#8217;s what technology does, right?  But the DROID looked slow very quickly.</p>
<p>So when Froyo (Android 2.2) came out the DROID got it down the line and that&#8217;s when the DROID started to show it&#8217;s age; extremely slow&#8230;a big drop in performance.  So I decided to root it to get a little more millage out of it before my upgrade.  Mind you, I was waiting for the <a title="Thundebolt via Phonearena" href="http://www.phonearena.com/phones/HTC-ThunderBolt_id4985" target="_blank">Thunderbolt</a> to come out to replace it&#8230;but decided against upgrading for the time&#8230;another story I suppose.  I decided to use <a title="SuperOneClick" href="http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=803682" target="_blank">SuperOneClick </a>to root my phone, and damn it was simple.  Literally one click and it was done&#8230;but what can I do with this root?  Well, first thing was overclocking to see if I can get some more speed.  I overclocked it to 800MHz and really didn&#8217;t notice much of a difference besides the fact that I could now have a wireless hot-spot&#8230;oh and I could take screen shots now (why doesn&#8217;t Android have this functionality built in? Seriously!).</p>
<div id="attachment_410" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 178px"><a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/snap20110411_111101.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-410" title="Android Screen shot" src="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/snap20110411_111101-168x300.png" alt="Android Screen shot" width="168" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Hey look, I need to ROOT to take a screen shot!</p></div>
<p>So I decided to take it a step further.  My buddy was telling me about <a title="CyanogenMod" href="http://www.cyanogenmod.com/" target="_blank">CyanogenMod</a> and how he loved it on his MyTouch and basically brought life back into it.  So I said &#8220;Why the hell not?&#8221;  Not only does it add a lot of functionality, it will give me Android 2.3.3 (Gingerbread)&#8230;something the original DROIDs won&#8217;t ever see normally.  I backed-up my apps and text messages phone using <a title="MyBackup Root" href="https://market.android.com/details?id=com.rerware.android.MyBackupRoot" target="_blank">MyBackup Root</a> then flashed my recovery ROM to ClockworkMod which allows me to install firmware from the SD card and allows me to backup my entire phone to an image just in case anything goes wrong.  After the backup with MyBackup Root I rebooted into recovery mode and backed-up the entire phone using the Nandroid backup (in the recovery) then started to flash CyanogenMod 7 on my phone..this meant I had to do a complete wipe of the phone which is always scary but with the backup I should be cool!</p>
<p>Wiped the phone, flashed the ROM, and booted the phone. It worked! I had the Release Candidate (at the time it was RC1) of CyanogenMod 7 on my phone!</p>
<p>I had some issues with CM7 at first and some issues with getting my apps back (which I&#8217;ll talk about in Part 2) but after some initial bumps I was up running as smooth as I could be on a release candidate.  I had some reboots and some programs would crash but reinstalling them from scratch helped for the most part.</p>
<p>After a few updates it became more and more stable.  I am now running RC4 with a new ultra-low voltage kernel (which allows me to overclock to 1GHz and uses less battery power than the stock kernel). which gives me good battery life, pretty good performance, and all around a pretty good experience.</p>
<div id="attachment_411" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 178px"><a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/aboutPhone.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-411" title="About my DROID" src="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/aboutPhone-168x300.png" alt="" width="168" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Android 2.3.3 and 1.1GHz! </p></div>
<p>So if you&#8217;re looking to get some more time from your old DROID this seems like a great way to do it.  It&#8217;s not up there with the new phones, but it does give your device a nice little jolt until you decide to retire it.</p>
<p>In Part 2 I&#8217;ll talk about installing all of the apps from backup and troubleshooting the many issues I had with memory issues and how they were resolved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/getting-more-from-my-original-droid-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon iPhone: UNICORNS!!!!</title>
		<link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/01/verizon-iphone-unicorns/</link>
		<comments>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/01/verizon-iphone-unicorns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahlman IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VZW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearofthegeek.net/?p=380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, so it&#8217;s finally out, Verizon now has the iPhone.  And unicorns are flying around now apparently.  Of course the blogosphere and the media are insane right now but I have also seen my fair share of complaints and I laugh at a good amount of them.  Some of them even make me want to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so it&#8217;s finally out, Verizon now has the iPhone.  And unicorns are flying around now apparently.  Of course the blogosphere and the media are insane right now but I have also seen my fair share of complaints and I laugh at a good amount of them.  Some of them even make me want to slap someone. Let me go through them.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Not GSM, can&#8217;t use all over the world</strong>:  Okay, were you really expecting this? Verizon is CDMA, their phones work only in the US.  Yes, they offer world phones, but did anyone really believe they&#8217;d make a &#8220;world iPhone?&#8221;</li>
<li><strong>Not 4G/LTE</strong>: Apple will not update the iPhone in the middle of it&#8217;s life cycle to put 4G in the device.  Maybe the next one in July will have it, but expecting a 4G iPhone to come out today was really far-fetched.</li>
<li><strong>Can&#8217;t use data and voice simultaneously</strong>: Let me see. Anyone who would need this should know that CDMA cannot do this, it never has been able to and it never will.  Why the hell would anyone expect the iPhone to suddenly let CDMA do this?  It&#8217;s not about the phone people, it&#8217;s the network.  In my life, I have probably had the need to do this maybe 4 times, and I&#8217;m a tech junkie!  Maybe that&#8217;s me, but I still wonder how much people really need/care about this.</li>
<li><strong>Verizon might install apps on the phone</strong>: I don&#8217;t think Apple would allow this. They didn&#8217;t allow it on AT&amp;T&#8230;.why would they allow it for Verizon?  If they do, I&#8217;ll eat my shoe.</li>
</ul>
<p>So those are really the fun ones I&#8217;ve heard. I&#8217;m sure there is someone out there who always uses data and voice, but then stay with AT&amp;T! If you travel out of the country a lot, chances are you don&#8217;t have Verizon anyway. I believe that these complains are from people on AT&amp;T fed up with them and they were hoping Verizon would swoop in and save them from everything bad about AT&amp;T&#8230;and are disappointed that they can&#8217;t just get everything they want.  So a message; stop crying. You&#8217;re never going to get everything you want, face it.</p>
<h2>
<p><div id="attachment_387" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/iphoneUnicorn1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-387" title="iphoneUnicorn" src="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/iphoneUnicorn1-300x272.jpg" alt="Unicorn Power!" width="300" height="272" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">What everyone expected...</p></div></h2>
<h2>What will Happen Next?</h2>
<p>How many people are going to jump the AT&amp;T ship to go to Verizon now?  I know of a few off hand that will as soon as they can. Honestly, switching carriers for a phone is just ridiculous.  I always thought this, especially when everyone complained &#8220;Oh my god I can&#8217;t wait until the iPhone is on Verizon so I can finally dump AT&amp;T!&#8221;  My question, why bother have a cell phone on a network that doesn&#8217;t make you happy?  Isn&#8217;t the point of a cell phone to have cellular service?  If you switch providers simply for a phone, then that&#8217;s dumb.  Switch because one has the features you want, or because one&#8217;s cheaper, you know..a <em>good</em> reason.  If you&#8217;re going to leave AT&amp;T now because you had shitty service and were just waiting for an iPhone to come to a better network, that&#8217;s even a good reason..that&#8217;s probably why most people will leave, but don&#8217;t complain when you can&#8217;t use your voice and data at the same time since you switched, that&#8217;s your own dumb fault for not knowing you can&#8217;t do it.</p>
<p>I also wonder how many Verizon Android users will hop over to the iPhone.  I know this will happen (again, I already know of some people who are thinking of doing this), but I really want to see how many people will end up doing this.  I myself have thought, &#8220;Humm, if a Verizon iPhone came around, would I go for it?&#8221;  I do like the iPhone hardware and iOS is nice but I&#8217;m very happy with Android and I see very good Android devices coming out in the near future.  I&#8217;m also used to it&#8217;s features and I know I&#8217;d miss some of them if I went to the iPhone.  Only time will tell, but come August when I&#8217;m up for a new phone I hope to have a choice of some LTE Android phones or even an LTE iPhone.</p>
<p>Wrapping up, what does this change?  Nothing much.  People will still switch companies for a phone, and people will still not be happy with things they&#8217;ve wished for.  Not a single person will get everything they want from their phone or network, and that&#8217;s the way it will be forever.  I want a device that can work on CDMA and GSM and underground, but guess what? That&#8217;s not happening. Am I going to complain and call something I waited for a failure? No, because these are <em>my</em> wants, <em>my</em> needs.  Cell companies and device makers don&#8217;t have an obligation to anyone.  This iPhone hype was all created by the media.  All of these wishes were created by the media.  Verizon and Apple didn&#8217;t promise anybody anything, they simply said &#8220;we have an announcement&#8221; and that&#8217;s all it took for everyone to go ape shit and expect all of these things from the device, hell people didn&#8217;t even know it was actually an iPhone announcement until they said it.  It could have been a Windows Phone 7 announcement!  The fact of the matter is that you can&#8217;t always get what you want.  Listen to the Stones, people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/01/verizon-iphone-unicorns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Experience with an iPad</title>
		<link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/01/my-experience-with-an-ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/01/my-experience-with-an-ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahlman IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearofthegeek.net/?p=375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy New Years to all! Now that that&#8217;s out of the way I present an update! It&#8217;s been a fun 5 months, and I&#8217;ve been busy and I really have not had much to write about in with technology ranting or whatever, but I feel the need to actually write something now.  It might be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy New Years to all!</p>
<p>Now that that&#8217;s out of the way I present an update! It&#8217;s been a fun 5 months, and I&#8217;ve been busy and I really have not had much to write about in with technology ranting or whatever, but I feel the need to actually write something now.  It might be funny to see me write about it because of my <a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/02/ipad/"> February post</a> on the iPad, but I am writing about my experience with my iPad.  Now you might ask &#8220;you said you wouldn&#8217;t buy one!&#8221; Well, I didn&#8217;t buy it.  I won it at work back in September (<a href="http://twitpic.com/2sk7qr" target="_blank">see!</a>).  So after 3-4 months of using it I felt I should write something about it, so here we go.</p>
<p>When I first got it, I was excited (who wouldn&#8217;t be) but I found out quickly that I really had no practical use for it.  Everything I would want to do with it on the road (send/read email, calendars, Facebook/Twitter, etc.) I can do on my phone.  And what&#8217;s more, I can do those on my phone from ANY location as opposed to anywhere with wifi (this iPad is wifi only).  I began downloading and installing apps and games and found that while a lot of the iPhone versions of apps and games are free, iPad versions aren&#8217;t.  I&#8217;m cheap, so I don&#8217;t buy apps.  A lot of the apps I wanted for the iPad also had free counterparts for Android, so I might as well use my phone instead.</p>
<p>I did find it useful at home when I didn&#8217;t want to take out the 17-inch laptop.  I can check Facebook and Twitter without an issue (and the apps are usually better than using my laptop anyway) and watching Youtube videos on the iPad is great actually, much better than the site!  I also use it to play Scrabble with friends.  All of these are just secondary things that are just helping push my laziness even more, nothing totally useful for me at least.  There are two apps I found particularly useful though; VLC and Remote.</p>
<p>Everyone knows VLC (and if you don&#8217;t&#8230;you <a href="http://www.videolan.org/vlc/" target="_blank">SHOULD</a>), it plays any video file on the iPad without having to convert it, and you don&#8217;t even need to sync your computer and iPad, you just drag the video into the VLC list in iTunes and it&#8217;s done. I found this great to watch downloaded video&#8217;s and ripped DVDs while witting around, just put a pair of headphones on and you&#8217;re good to go.  I like being able to hand off the iPad to someone to show them <em>Archer</em> or something.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/itunes/remote/" target="_blank">Remote</a> is an iTunes remote control program.  I can control my home desktop iTunes from the iPad from anywhere I get my home wireless signal.  This comes in handy when you want to listen to music while you&#8217;re cleaning, or cooking, or in the other room.  You can raise the volume, change and search songs, make palylists, etc.  I also found it can wake a sleeping computer up to connect to the iTunes library.  The only thing is that iTunes needs to be running on the machine for it to work of course, a very minor issue I think.  I found this extremely useful during a party when I just left the iPad out and asked people make playlisst and add whatever they wanted to hear to the list.</p>
<p>So all in all, I do enjoy having the iPad but I still believe that it&#8217;s not something I <em>need</em>.  It&#8217;s fun, it&#8217;s helpful, but for me it&#8217;s just not a real replacement for anything just yet.  Maybe when I get a cable provider that utilizes it I will change my mind, but right now, not yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/01/my-experience-with-an-ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Update from Motorola on the eFuse</title>
		<link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/07/an-update-from-motorola-on-the-efuse/</link>
		<comments>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/07/an-update-from-motorola-on-the-efuse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahlman IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearofthegeek.net/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Holy cow, a third update in two days?!?  Yep! Today Motorola responded to all of the eFuse nonsense with something that makes the situation a bit better. Motorola&#8217;s primary focus is the security of our end users and protection of their data, while also meeting carrier, partner and legal requirements. The Droid X and a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy cow, a third update in two days?!?  Yep!</p>
<p>Today Motorola responded to all of the eFuse nonsense with  something  that makes the situation a <em>bit</em> better.</p>
<blockquote><p>Motorola&#8217;s primary focus is the security of our end users  and  protection of their data, while also meeting carrier, partner and  legal  requirements. The Droid X and a majority of Android consumer  devices on  the market today have a secured bootloader. In reference  specifically to  eFuse, the technology is not loaded with the purpose of  preventing a  consumer device from functioning, but rather ensuring for  the user that  the device only runs on updated and tested versions of  software. <strong>If  a device attempts to boot with unapproved software, it  will go into  recovery mode, and can re-boot once approved software is  re-installed.</strong> Checking for a valid software configuration is a  common practice within  the industry to protect the user against  potential malicious software  threats. Motorola has been a long time  advocate of open platforms and  provides a number of resources to  developers to foster the ecosystem  including tools and access to  devices via MOTODEV at  http://developer.motorola.com.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is very good compared to bricking the phone.  At least the phone  can be recovered by the user instead of having to ship it to Motorola  for a repair(not sure of the complete details and how warranty would work).  I&#8217;m also happy to see that Moto responded so quickly to the public.  However, this  still does not sit well with me as Android was developed with developers  and tinkering in mind.  If I want to mess around with my device, why  can&#8217;t I?</p>
<p>(Thanks to <a href="http://disq.us/h9pbk" target="_blank">Tom</a> for pointing this out for me)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/07/an-update-from-motorola-on-the-efuse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T-Mobile, Big Red, Samsung, and Moto dump on the Open Handset Alliance</title>
		<link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/07/t-mobile-big-red-samsung-and-moto-dump-on-the-open-handset-alliance/</link>
		<comments>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/07/t-mobile-big-red-samsung-and-moto-dump-on-the-open-handset-alliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahlman IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearofthegeek.net/?p=356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me set the stage up for those who don&#8217;t know much background. In 2005, Android, Inc. (a small company in Cali) was acquired by Google. Android, Inc. was a start-up whose business was in developing software for mobile phones. In 2007 Google helped fund the Open handset Alliance (OHA) which is a consortium of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me set the stage up for those who don&#8217;t know much background.  In 2005, Android, Inc. (a small company in Cali) was acquired by Google.  Android, Inc. was a start-up whose business was in developing software for mobile phones.  In 2007 Google helped fund the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Handset_Alliance">Open handset Alliance</a> (OHA) which is a consortium of several technology companies whose purpose was to develop open standards for mobile devices.  Motorola, Samsung, and T-Mobile and among these companies.  These companies should all be first in line to make phones more open and free, right?</p>
<p>Well&#8230;</p>
<p>Yesterday&#8217;s <a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/07/the-droid-x-and-the-efuse-moto-shooting-themselves-in-the-foot/">post</a> has already shown us that Motorola should really rework some of their business practices, but it also puts them in a precarious position in the OHA by going against what the OHA is exactly trying to stop, carrier and corporate lockdown of mobile devices.  Some even think that because of the eFuse <a href="http://www.absolutelyandroid.com/why-motorola-should-be-asked-to-leave-the-open-handset-alliance/">Moto should be asked to leave the OHA</a>, and I&#8217;m not entirely sure that they&#8217;re wrong in asking this.  If they are supposed to abide by the OHA terms, they should. No deviations.</p>
<p>Now for another punch in the OHA/Android face, T-Mobile and Verizon are now <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2010/07/android-junkware.html">installing &#8220;junkware&#8221; in their new Android phones</a> that cannot be removed in most circumstances.  The LA Times blog is reporting that, &#8220;the Droid X comes loaded with several nonstandard applications for Google&#8217;s Android, most of which cannot be removed&#8221; and that T-Mobile&#8217;s new Samsung Vibrant is also loaded with some extra apps that cannot be removed.  What kind of apps are installed?  Here&#8217;s a few snips:</p>
<blockquote><p>Among the [Droid X's] so-called junkware is a Blockbuster video app and a demo for an Electronic Arts game called Need for Speed: Shift&#8230;.The EA racing game, which provides limited functionality and a large button on the introduction screen urging players to buy the full version, can be removed&#8230;</p>
<p>Skype, which is included with other Android handsets Verizon sells, is a permanent fixture, as is a utility called City ID. The latter program provides location information about phone numbers on the incoming call screen. But it works for only 15 days before asking users to pay $1.99 per month&#8230;</p>
<p>The T-Mobile Vibrant phone from Samsung, meanwhile, has four of these extra apps staring you in the face.</p>
<p>One is the movie &#8220;Avatar,&#8221; permanently loaded onto the device&#8230;Another is a live video channel called MobiTV &#8212; good for only 30 days. The third is a link to install an EA game called The Sims 3: Collector&#8217;s Edition. The last is an outdated version of Amazon&#8217;s Kindle app.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also Slacker Radio, which cannot be used before providing an e-mail address, and a button leading to Gogo Inflight Internet&#8217;s website, which includes a one-month trial for Web surfing (only on plans that provide the service).</p>
<p>Try as you might, none of these apps can be uninstalled.</p></blockquote>
<p>That is an awful lot of software to load onto a phone that runs an operating system that is supposed to be &#8220;free&#8221; and &#8220;open&#8221; for it&#8217;s users.  The fact that most of them cannot be uninstalled is the most enraging part.  I&#8217;m also sure that these apps take up a good deal of storage space.</p>
<p>Samsung, Motorola, Verizon, and T-Mobile are completely going against the principles of the OHA which they are all (with the exception of Verizon) a part of.  But I&#8217;d probably blame the carries more because in the end, they are the one&#8217;s with final say on what is loaded on their devices.</p>
<p>So, should all of them be asked to leave the OHA?  I&#8217;d say that if they continue this trend then yes.  The OHA should give them an ultimatum to stop and they should take it or leave.  If the OHA fails to even deliver on that then what is the point of the OHA?  If you&#8217;re not going to stand by one of your most basic principles then you have failed.</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t think this is worse than the eFuse in the Droid X, it certainly is something that needs to be resolved just as rapidly.  Putting a few small applications on a phone specific to your company is not really a problem, not allowing your customers to remove them is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/07/t-mobile-big-red-samsung-and-moto-dump-on-the-open-handset-alliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Droid X and the eFuse: Moto shooting themselves in the foot</title>
		<link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/07/the-droid-x-and-the-efuse-moto-shooting-themselves-in-the-foot/</link>
		<comments>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/07/the-droid-x-and-the-efuse-moto-shooting-themselves-in-the-foot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahlman IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VZW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearofthegeek.net/?p=347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year I bought my first smartphone, a Motorola DROID from Verizon. This is my first Moto phone since I got a RAZR many moons ago and swore off Moto forever because of their shitty product. Now, I love my DROID, it does everything I need it to do and more, and I really think [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year I bought my first smartphone, a Motorola DROID from Verizon.  This is my first Moto phone since I got a RAZR many moons ago and swore off Moto forever because of their shitty product.  Now, I love my DROID, it does everything I need it to do and more, and I really think Moto got it right with the DROID (I also applaud Big Red for finally making their phones more open).  Since the DROID came out Moto has yet to release another kick-ass Android-based phone; the CLIQ is a piece of junk so don&#8217;t say that.  Verizon has released the DROID Incredible (an HTC device) which is also making the rounds as being an amazing phone, but people were waiting for Moto&#8217;s next DROID.  The Droid X was to be the next amazing Verizon/Android/Moto Android phone but with its release something has popped up on the tech radar; the eFuse.</p>
<p>According to a source at <a href="http://www.mydroidworld.com/forums/droid-x-discussion/3330-how-droid-x-locked-down-let-me-tell-you-what-i-know.html">My Droid World</a> (and <a href="http://community.developer.motorola.com/t5/MOTODEV-Blog/Custom-ROMs-and-Motorola-s-Android-Handsets/bc-p/4290#M432title=Custom">Motorola themselves</a>), the Droid X has an eFuse chip installed in the device.  The long and short of it is that Motorola has installed this eFuse in the new Droid X which checks the phone for the proper kernel, boot-loader, and ROM and if the proper software is not found it will automatically &#8220;trip a fuse&#8221; to corrupt the phone&#8217;s boot-loader forcing you to get it repaired and will most likely void your warranty.  Oh and did I mention that the phone can ONLY be repaired by Motorola, so the Verizon Store won&#8217;t help you (well, they&#8217;ll ship it to them for you) and you&#8217;ll most likely end up pay for a new phone.</p>
<p>Why is Motorola doing this to their phones?  According to the Motorola blog:</p>
<blockquote><p>We understand there is a community of developers interested in going beyond Android application development and experimenting with Android system development and re-flashing phones.  For these developers, we highly recommend obtaining either a Google ADP1 developer phone or a Nexus One, both of which are intended for these purposes.  At this time, Motorola Android-based handsets are intended for use by consumers and Android application developers, and we have currently chosen not to go into the business of providing fully unlocked developer phones.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now if I read that correctly, Motorola just told people to buy an HTC device (the Nexus One or a Google ADP1 dev phone) and not their product because their &#8220;Android-based handsets are intended for use by consumers and Android application developers.&#8221;  So, the DROID was a fluke? Well&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>When we do deviate from our normal practice, such as we did with the DROID, there is a specific business reason for doing so.  We understand this can result in some confusion, and apologize for any frustration.</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re joking, right?  You deviated on the DROID for a &#8220;business reason&#8221; and now that everyone loves your Android-based phones, you&#8217;re going to change it?  How stupid does that sound?</p>
<p>First, if you&#8217;re going to say you have a reason you could at least tell the people what that reason was even if it&#8217;s most likely about money.  Secondly, why would you want to change something that has worked already?  You know the whole &#8220;no fix if no broke&#8221; thing?  The DROID was probably the best smartphone released last year because of it&#8217;s features and it&#8217;s openness.  Taking one of those key selling points away is really going to piss people off.  Also, not only is it frustrating, it&#8217;s just a punch right in the face of all the people who praised your phone for it&#8217;s openness.</p>
<p>What happens when (like the MyTouch 3g and G1, etc) the developers stop caring about a phone so much that they don&#8217;t release a new version of Android for it, when their phones are still capable of running them?  Or if Motorola decides not to update the SenseUI on the phone and you&#8217;re stuck with whatever they stop with?  Well, of course you&#8217;re supposed to buy another phone from them, but it probably won&#8217;t be a Moto phone if the eFuse is still there.  But there are a lot of people want to get all they can from their device (I mean, you did pay $200+ for it!).  So they&#8217;ll end up going the route of rooting a phone and installing a modded Android install and continue to be happy with your device.  Does it change that fact that it&#8217;s still a Motorola brand phone? No, it just shows that your hardware still kicks ass 2 years after it was released instead of going to the bottom of the old electronics drawer or whatever.</p>
<p>I realize not everyone cares about modding their phones, hell it&#8217;s most likely a larger portion than the people who do care, but the issue is that Motorola is making it okay for a company to brick YOUR phone if they don&#8217;t like what you do to it.  You know, the phone YOU paid for with YOUR money (which Motorola took of course!).  A lot of people buy devices based on how much the company lets you tinker with the device after you buy it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m almost positive that the phone will still be hacked, but this is going to cause a big backlash in the Android community against Motorola (and probably Verizon even though they most likely have nothing to do with it).  A lot of Android folk are very pro-open-source and while the software is still &#8220;open&#8221; the hardware will strike you down if you try to change it.</p>
<p>While I won&#8217;t tell people not to buy a Moto phone again I will say that the Droid X will probably be a bad choice if you&#8217;re going to alter the base software or if you want the phone to last a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/07/the-droid-x-and-the-efuse-moto-shooting-themselves-in-the-foot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPad : {Insert feminine product joke here}</title>
		<link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/02/ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/02/ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahlman IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearofthegeek.net/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I was supposed to write about the other 2 posts on TUAW regarding the iPhone wish list, but I figure I should just skip that and go right into the iPad, the latest gadget from Apple.  For the last year I&#8217;ve been seeing rumors about the all mysterious &#8220;Apple tablet&#8221; that they&#8217;re working on.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I was supposed to write about the other 2 posts on TUAW regarding the iPhone wish list, but I figure I should just skip that and go right into the iPad, the latest gadget from Apple.  For the last year I&#8217;ve been seeing rumors about the all mysterious &#8220;Apple tablet&#8221; that they&#8217;re working on.  I couldn&#8217;t go one day without some site I browse having something about this damn thing.  I actually was hoping that it would be something more than &#8220;a big iPhone.&#8221;  I think my hopes got too high, and when I saw the announcement online I was just confused.</p>
<p>First thing, I&#8217;m really not a tablet PC type of person anyway, so I was hoping that it would at least have something different than other tablets, or even something so good that I might even want to get one.  Lets face it, I do like my Apple products; my 80GB iPod, my old 40GB iPod, my MacBook Pro, the lab machines, the servers, etc.  I enjoy using them for the most part and I believe that Apple does make quality products.  And you already know my disdain for the iPhone from my last <a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/01/tuaws-iphone-4-0-wish-list-has-some-stupid-wishes/">two</a> <a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/01/cell-phone-fussing/">posts</a>, so you can&#8217;t really say I&#8217;m a fanboy; meaning I&#8217;m not going to buy everything Steve Jobs says because he said to, NO. I&#8217;m going to buy a product I feel has a use in my life, and that I will like to use.  And the iPad just doesn&#8217;t do it for me.</p>
<p>There are many things that they should/could have done differently with it, but they didn&#8217;t.  I admit, it&#8217;s very nice looking and I <em>can</em> see <em>some</em> uses for it (below) but I just don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s practical for most.</p>
<p>The iPad would be an excellent control for, say, a media system or a professional presentation.  I can see people buying one of these for their office to use as a datebook or a replacement for magazines and newspapers or even to control things in their office (lights, music, etc). Using it as an eReader or an internet device when on the road? I just don&#8217;t see it.  Reading the screen would probably be like reading a book on your computer screen, you&#8217;ll go blind.  Why is the Kindle so popular? It uses e-ink and doesn&#8217;t blind you with back lighting.  That&#8217;s the whole point of it.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, using the iPad as a magazine or newspaper reader would be great, you can&#8217;t do that shit with e-ink but $400 for a magazine reader? I don&#8217;t know&#8230;</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t see people buying this thing as a gaming device.  (Yes, I know that&#8217;s not the point of the iPad) Sure, it can do some nifty graphics and tilt functions, but it&#8217;s so big compared to a Nintendo DS or a PSP.  And those systems won&#8217;t make you look like an idiot steering a box in public.  And about the games and apps; all iPhone apps work on it, great, now I can have an iPhone sized app running on my 9 inch tablet, way to utilize the screen space.  Yeah, you can zoom in, but what happens when you zoom in on things that weren&#8217;t meant to be zoomed in on? That&#8217;s right, it looks like a piece of mosaic.</p>
<p>The drawing features are nice. I can see many artists or designers wanting this to sketch out things on the fly and be able to send it to someone without a scanner or whatnot&#8230;but why not take that a step more?  Make a deal with Wacom and allow it to become an actual Wacom tablet.  Charge like $50 for an app that when you plug it into your PC it shows the screen of the PC and allows you to draw on it! Genius! That would actually make it multifunction; hell I&#8217;d consider buying it then.</p>
<p>Speaking of multifunction, I must say this:</p>
<p>HAHAHAHAHA!</p>
<p>They didn&#8217;t learn that people really wanted multitasking. I know many folks who were very pissed off about this and I just ask them, &#8220;you&#8217;re surprised?&#8221; Good luck on the next update.</p>
<p>Oh and another one: Think they&#8217;d learn from their AT&amp;T problems?</p>
<p>AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!</p>
<p>Unfortunately, sticking with AT&amp;T was inevitable; the iPhone is AT&amp;T only, so why in the hell would they move to another carrier?  If they released a new iPhone for Verizon then I&#8217;d see it to be more plausible&#8230;until then, enjoy your AT&amp;T iPad users!</p>
<p>Oh and the name&#8230;iPad?  You&#8217;re fucking Apple! You couldn&#8217;t have used one of the much better names like iTablet or my personal favorite, the iSlate? You went with the name in which <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsjU0K8QPhs">MadTV did a skit</a> on already making the joke that everyone is making now? Wow. Someone missed that joke from like 3 years ago. That&#8217;s why people are making those jokes, not really because of the maxipad/pad reference, but because it was already a stupid joke on MadTV.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that the iPad is a failure, or it&#8217;s a completely useless product, because it&#8217;s not.  I&#8217;m just giving my $0.02.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/02/ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

