<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Year of the Geek &#187; cell phone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yearofthegeek.net/tag/cell-phone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yearofthegeek.net</link>
	<description>More like 25 Years, but this is easier.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:16:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Long Overdue Thunderbolt Review-type-thing</title>
		<link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/06/a-long-overdue-thunderbolt-review-type-thing/</link>
		<comments>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/06/a-long-overdue-thunderbolt-review-type-thing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahlman IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thunderbolt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearofthegeek.net/?p=439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two months ago I said I would write something about the Thunderbolt..it was only supposed to be about two weeks but life happens I suppose.  Honestly, I wasn't expecting to cave-in and buy the thing but I found a coupon for $50 off and thought, "well, this might be good!"  I bought the phone only a few weeks after I decided to root my original DROID (which from now on will be reffered to as OG, Original Gangsta) and install cyanogenmod 7.  Being the happy owner of one of the best Android phones to ever come out (I'm a little biased toward the OG, but others agree!) I had high hopes for what was supposed to be Verizon's new super phone; it's also the first phone to use their 4G LTE network.  What I got from it was a mixed set of feelings that make me miss my OG sometimes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="That didn’t last as long as I was expecting…" href="http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/that-didnt-last-as-long-as-i-was-expecting/">Two months</a> ago I said I would write something about the Thunderbolt..it was only supposed to be about two weeks but life happens I suppose.  Honestly, I wasn&#8217;t expecting to cave-in and buy the thing but I found a coupon for $50 off and thought, &#8220;well, this might be good!&#8221;  I bought the phone only a few weeks after I decided to <a title="Getting more from my Original DROID (Part 1:Rooting and CM7)" href="http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/getting-more-from-my-original-droid-1/">root my original DROID</a> (which from now on will be referred to as OG, Original Gangsta) and <a title="Getting more from my Original DROID (Part 2: Restoring and Troubleshooting)" href="http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/getting-more-from-my-original-droid-part-2/">install cyanogenmod 7</a>.  Being the happy owner of one of the best Android phones to ever come out I had high hopes for what was supposed to be Verizon&#8217;s new super flagship phone as well as the first phone to use their 4G LTE network.  What I got from it was a mixed set of feelings that make me miss my OG sometimes.</p>
<p>Let me get this out of the way first, I like this phone a lot.  It&#8217;s a great device, it&#8217;s fast, it&#8217;s sexy, it&#8217;s big..but it&#8217;s not perfect&#8230;far from it, and most of the reason is due to the crap software that is on it&#8230;let me explain.</p>
<h2>The UI and Software</h2>
<p>My OG ran stock vanilla Android (what devs call AOSP: Android Open Source Project). This basically means it&#8217;s the bare Android OS with no added UI tweaks and no added bloatware crap (with exception to some Verizon apps).  This is the best way to run Android for the most part because it&#8217;s not using the CPU or RAM to run some fancy/ugly user interface over top of it, it&#8217;s not going to have built-in apps syncing crap in the background, it&#8217;s just plain ol&#8217; vanilla ice cream (and I like vanilla ice cream).  And it works!  It doesn&#8217;t waste CPU (meaning it&#8217;s faster) and it doesn&#8217;t background sync unnecessary apps constantly (meaning battery savings) unless you install them.  But of course, HTC and other companies want to change it to suit their own phones and needs.</p>
<div id="attachment_440" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 190px"><a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/aosp1.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-440" title="AOSP SS" src="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/aosp1-180x300.png" alt="Stock Android Screenshot from N1" width="180" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">This is a Screenshot from a Nexus 1 running AOSP 2.2</p></div>
<p>Now, the Thunderbolt (as with many HTC phones) doesn&#8217;t do AOSP Android, they use Sense UI, it&#8217;s their own user interface which they designed to put on mobile devices for a &#8220;sleek&#8221; and &#8220;unified&#8221; look.</p>
<div id="attachment_441" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 224px"><a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/htcsenseui.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-441" title="HTC Sense UI Screenshot" src="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/htcsenseui-214x300.jpg" alt="HTC Sense UI Screenshot" width="214" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">This is Sense UI</p></div>
<p>While some people like the look (which I don&#8217;t think is terrible mind you) and the feel, I don&#8217;t like it, I hate it.  There are several reasons I hate it actually the first and most important being that it&#8217;s clunky and slow to respond VERY often; it feels like my OG before I rooted it&#8230;this shouldn&#8217;t happen on a 1Ghz phone with 700+MB or RAM.  So what I did to &#8220;fix&#8221; this was install <a title="Android Market for ADW.Launcher" href="https://market.android.com/details?id=org.adw.launcher&amp;feature=search_result" target="_blank">ADW.Launcher</a> and use that as my home app.  It&#8217;s faster, and it looks and feels more like a stock phone now.  Second, they package a whole mess of crap in with it; they have a &#8220;friendsteam&#8221; which gathers your Twitter and Facebook and whatnot into a widget on your screen and displays it and updates it for you; a weather widget (which is actually nice, but i should have a choice to remove it);  and their own Facebook and Twitter syncing built in.  This is stuff I&#8217;d like to install on my own and not have running in the background constantly asking me to log in and sync; if I want Twitter and FB, let me install them myself.  They also use their own MMS app which is very slow compared to the AOSP app.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>You might be thinking, &#8220;man, this is cool that it&#8217;s all built-in, why are you hating on this?&#8221;  Because I like to be able to choose what to have installed on my device.  Because of these built in apps (which mind you, aren&#8217;t really apps, they&#8217;re more like utilities) I have two Facebook apps, and two Twitter apps and it&#8217;s kinda dumb to waste space on stuff like that.  I also find it annoying that they START UP WITH THE DEVICE&#8230;even when I DON&#8217;T USE THEM.  What a waste of CPU and battery.  Once CM7 is released for the phone (not Alpha-builds) that will be my savior.  Verizon is also guilty of bundling tons of bloatware with this device.  When I received the phone it was PACKED with tons and tons of useless crap..and you can&#8217;t remove this stuff!  I&#8217;ve <a title="T-Mobile, Big Red, Samsung, and Moto dump on the Open Handset Alliance" href="http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/07/t-mobile-big-red-samsung-and-moto-dump-on-the-open-handset-alliance/">written</a> about carriers loading bloatware onto phones before, this shit needs to stop with Android.</p>
<h2>The Battery</h2>
<p>Smartphones are notorious for having crummy batteries.  My OG was actually pretty great before the last few months of using it.  I used to get over a day with it and I was happy.  When deciding on a new phone every review I read had the same complaint with regard to the Thunderbolt: The battery is terrible.  Now, I&#8217;m never far from a power source, and I have around 4 or 5 micro-USB chargers from my older devices and ones that I found around the lab, so this wasn&#8217;t too much of an issue for me.  My first day on the phone I got through the entire day of heavy use and texting without it dying, it got to about 5% by midnight (from 8am or so).  The second day, same thing.  On the third day that&#8217;s when it ended.  Without using it too much I made it to about 2pm before it started dying on me, I charged it and it was low again by 9pm.  Now I see what the complaints were about.  I tried using task killers to kill unwanted tasks, I synced data less, I lowered brightness, nothing helped.  I read around online and found the best way to get more mileage was to turn off 4G.  I figured, I don&#8217;t need 4G all the time, so it&#8217;s fine, if I get more battery time out of it this is what needs to be done.  After turning off 4G, I get through the day again.  A few weeks ago an update was released that helped the 4G radio consume less power, so since then I&#8217;ve actually been able to leave 4G on and get through most of my day with it&#8230;so good on them for fixing that.</p>
<h2>The Hardware Itself</h2>
<p>This is where the phone really does come out.  This phone has some weight to it (it&#8217;s heavier than my OG which was a brick) and it&#8217;s got that big bright screen.  The screen makes it so easy to read things on and to watch videos, the rubberized back makes it easy to hold, the weight makes it feel like you&#8217;re not going to crush it in your hands.  It is a nice, solid phone.  It&#8217;s also fast when you need it to be.  Playing games, running apps, downloading, it just runs fast (especially with ADW.Launcher).  Of course Verizon&#8217;s network helps too, I get 4G everywhere in NYC, and the 4G speeds are really good (EVEN INDOORS! Take that WiMax!).  I have plenty of space on the 32GB MicroSD card they give you and on the internal storage (8GB but only about 2.5 are available).  The only complaints I have about the hardware and design: no dedicated camera button, I really miss this, but it&#8217;s fairly minor; the bluetooth volume is super low, I&#8217;ve read that it only does it with some headsets but my Jabra is so low I cannot use it; and the GPS takes forever to lock on, sometimes 5-10 minutes.  Now, some of this is probably software-based so a fix may be in line (apparently there might be an update in the next month or so to address some of these issues as well as the random reboots caused by the last update) but until that fix is out these problems will remain.</p>
<h2>Overall</h2>
<p>So to sum this up in a few lines (<strong>TL;DR</strong>); I really like this phone a lot, it is a great phone by design.  The 1Ghz Snapdragon processor and the large amount of RAM really make this phone fly with apps and games and with Verizon&#8217;s 4G it really is a speedy phone in all faces.  However, the phone has many kinks due to some bad software that comes bundled with it and a broken update from HTC.  Most of it&#8217;s issues are solely based on the software so hopefully we will see fixes for them in the future.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/06/a-long-overdue-thunderbolt-review-type-thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>That didn&#8217;t last as long as I was expecting&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/that-didnt-last-as-long-as-i-was-expecting/</link>
		<comments>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/that-didnt-last-as-long-as-i-was-expecting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahlman IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyanogenmod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new purchase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearofthegeek.net/?p=436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I decided to upgrade to the Thunderbolt after all.  Main reason: I got $50 off from a web coupon.  I'm going to write a little bit about it after I've used it a bit more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I decided to upgrade to the Thunderbolt after all.  Main reason: I got $50 off from a web coupon.  I&#8217;m going to write a little bit about it after I&#8217;ve used it a bit more.</p>
<p>Some first impressions: This thing is super fast, it&#8217;s got a nice feeling to it (not as solid as my DROID but still pretty well built), and the screen is really really nice.  The battery life isn&#8217;t as bad as everyone says it it&#8230;I got a full day out of it with fairly heavy use&#8230;we&#8217;ll see if that continues though.  I hate SenseUI&#8230;so I replaced it with ADW Launcher right away and I&#8217;m waiting for CyanogenMod to come out for it (it&#8217;s currently being worked on).  So expect some sort of review in the coming days/weeks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/that-didnt-last-as-long-as-i-was-expecting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting more from my Original DROID (Part 2: Restoring and Troubleshooting)</title>
		<link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/getting-more-from-my-original-droid-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/getting-more-from-my-original-droid-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahlman IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyanogenmod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DROID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearofthegeek.net/?p=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In part 1 I described (in little detail) how I rooted my phone and installed CyanogenMod 7 on it to get some more mileage out of it until I upgrade to a newer device this year.  But of course every upgrade and every hack isn&#8217;t without it&#8217;s issues and every hack isn&#8217;t perfect at all.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a title="Getting more from my Original DROID (Part 1:Rooting and CM7)" href="http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/getting-more-from-my-original-droid-1/">part 1</a> I described (in little detail) how I rooted my phone and installed CyanogenMod 7 on it to get some more mileage out of it until I upgrade to a newer device this year.  But of course every upgrade and every hack isn&#8217;t without it&#8217;s issues and every hack isn&#8217;t perfect at all.  Cyanogen never claims to be 100% trouble-free, and every users&#8217; experience will vary depending on device and applications installed; after all, it is technically a hack made by third-party developers&#8230;and no developer is perfect. The methods for flashing are also different for each user.</p>
<p>I installed CM7 when it was at RC1 for the DROID (still buggy, but still good for everyday use) and I originally flashed my phone by doing a factory reset of the device (removes everything) and then installing the ROM. This gave me an endless boot screen.  What I had to do to fix this was not only do a factory reset, but wipe the cache partition AND the Dalvik cache partition.  This was easy with the ClockworkMod and it was also nearly 100% risk free since I had a complete Nandroid backup.  After wiping the two it booted successfully!</p>
<p>I noticed that in Android 2.3 Google will restore all of your previously purchased and downloaded apps if you want it to automatically on a new device (only the app itself, not the data..like game save data).  This is great, but I already decided to use MyBackup Root for this, mainly because I wanted to have my stuff there with all of the data.  So i just told the phone not to download everything and I&#8217;ll just restore everything from my backup.  What this left me with was broken installed apps with no way to update them because the Market links were all hosed.  This sucked, now what was I supposed to do?  I decided to flash again and allow Google to push the apps to my phone.  This process took some time but everything was downloaded for the most part; unfortunately, I didn&#8217;t have my app data, so all of my game data and all of my settings were gone&#8230;I check MyBackup and sure enough I was able to restore data only!  I did that and bingo, everything worked again with all of my old data!  A few apps needed to be reinstalled or needed their data wiped (Google maps and Facebook I think) but for the most part everything worked just as it was supposed to.</p>
<div id="attachment_424" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 178px"><a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Restore.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-424" title="MyBackup Root restore" src="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Restore-168x300.png" alt="" width="168" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Choose which to restore? Yay!</p></div>
<p>So now that I had my apps on my phone, I was nearing happiness with my hacked DROID.  I say nearing because I was still having many issues with other things.  I won&#8217;t go into every little one but I will talk about the two that almost made me decide to go back to stock.</p>
<h3>LED Notifications</h3>
<p>The one thing I love about Android phones is the LED notifications.  A simple little LED in the corner of my phone blinks different colors for certain things (texts, emails, etc) so I don&#8217;t need to turn the screen on, or unlock my phone to see what I missed or see what that beep was from&#8230;I can just look at the color of the LED.  Funny thing happened after installing, it stopped working.  I would look down and nothing would be blinking but when I unlocked my phone I&#8217;d notice an e-mail that I missed!  What was going on here?  I looked in the settings and found that CM has basically rewritten the notification system and you can customize colors and blink rate from it if you so desired, but instead it broke the damn thing.  This wouldn&#8217;t fly with me, I was about to go back to stock because one of my favorite features was broken&#8230;then I found the forums.  I searched the issue on the forums and found a lot of people with the same issue, on different phones even!  Reading through many of the posts they all usually came around to the same solution, un-check everything in the LED settings then check them again then hit &#8220;Reset all LED notifications&#8221; and reboot. And it worked!  I had my LED back and working and now it was even better because I can change the settings for every program and even change the colors and blink rate for them, pretty neat.</p>
<div id="attachment_426" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 178px"><a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/ledprogramsett.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-426" title="LED Program Settings" src="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/ledprogramsett-168x300.png" alt="" width="168" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Change color and rate for LED notifications</p></div>
<h3>Missing Messages</h3>
<p>Now that my LED notifications worked I was happy that I could look down and see if I missed any emails or (more importantly) text messages&#8230;but strangely I felt that I was receiving less messages.  I went an entire day without a text message, which is very odd for me actually.  I looked at my phone, no blinking LED, I unlocked the phone, no notification in the menu, I opened the messaging app and boom, new texts, some as old as a day!  What the hell was going on with this?  I&#8217;m missing text messages now?  This used to happen with my <a title="Cell Phone Fussing" href="http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/01/cell-phone-fussing/">EnV Touch</a>, never my DROID!  I tried resetting my notifications for the app, and it would work for a while after I opened the app.  I figured, okay, it&#8217;s fixed, but then it would stop later on in the day.  I was getting very frustrated with this now and was again thinking about going back to stock.  I hit the forums again and found one post about the issue with one simple solution:</p>
<div id="attachment_427" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 237px"><a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/message-app-check.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-427" title="Message App checkbox" src="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/message-app-check-227x300.png" alt="" width="227" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The solution! Check that box!</p></div>
<p>Once I checked that, never missed another message.  It locks the message app in the memory so it&#8217;s always running.  Sure it uses up memory, but my messages are more important to me than the amount of apps I can run at one time.</p>
<p><em>Side note: But why does the DROID do this with CM7?  The DROID has 256MB RAM, this was a lot when the phone came out and with 2.1 it was fine.  Once 2.2 was released memory was becoming a problem for the phone.  The phone had trouble even keeping the Home app in memory; if you ran a program that was memory hungry and went back to the home screen you&#8217;d have to wait for it to redraw because Android&#8217;s memory management would kill it.  So in CM7 you can see the two check boxes for home and messaging, this stoped the redrawing(relaunching) and the missing messages&#8230;but it took some memory away of course which means you can only do so much multitasking before apps start getting killed.  Android 2.3.3 uses more memory, and the DROID just doesn&#8217;t have that much&#8230;so CM7 also allows asset purging to free up RAM as well as compucache (memory compression).  These use a little CPU but allow you to multitask fairly well;  it&#8217;s nowhere near as good as other newer phones, but it works.</em></p>
<p>There were some other small odds and ends that I had fixed by tweaking settings and installing updates but I thought that these two were really the most damming for me.  I managed to fix them with help from other nerds at the <a title="CyanogenMod Forums" href="http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/">CyanogenMod Forums</a> who were running into similar issues and there are some I managed to fix by trial and error.  Now, he ROM still has it&#8217;s occasional reboots and hiccups (not very often) and they usually happen with two programs; Google Maps and the Camera app, but these crashes happen less and less with each update.</p>
<p>CM7 is now out of RC and was released as Gold&#8230;but not for the DROID yet.  It still is very much a work in progress, but the progress is going very quickly, and I really like the direction it&#8217;s heading.  They&#8217;ve managed to give DROID users Android 2.3 even after Motorola decided it &#8220;wouldn&#8217;t work&#8221; on the phone.  Well, it is working (for the most part) and I&#8217;m fairly happy with it.  It has really allowed me to use my phone a bit longer than I was expecting.  I&#8217;m probably going to wait until August to upgrade my phone instead of going for the Thunderbolt, but time may change that.  What I do know is that my phone still works well and I will get more time out of it because of the ROMS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/getting-more-from-my-original-droid-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting more from my Original DROID (Part 1:Rooting and CM7)</title>
		<link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/getting-more-from-my-original-droid-1/</link>
		<comments>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/getting-more-from-my-original-droid-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahlman IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DROID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearofthegeek.net/?p=409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love my DROID, I have since I got it over a year ago.  But in a year, a lot can happen with technology of course.  My phone was originally equipped with Android 2.1 (the first phone to have it actually) and had an ARM 600MHz processor (underclocked to 550 for battery life), and 256MB [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love my <a title="Cell Phone Fussing" href="http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/01/cell-phone-fussing/">DROID</a>, I have since I got it over a year ago.  But in a year, a lot can happen with technology of course.  My phone was originally equipped with Android 2.1 (the first phone to have it actually) and had an ARM 600MHz processor (underclocked to 550 for battery life), and 256MB RAM.  It was fast, really fast&#8230;and it took a while for phones to be that fast&#8230;but it didn&#8217;t last long.  Soon after the DROID came out every new phone that came out just got faster and faster very quickly..I mean, that&#8217;s what technology does, right?  But the DROID looked slow very quickly.</p>
<p>So when Froyo (Android 2.2) came out the DROID got it down the line and that&#8217;s when the DROID started to show it&#8217;s age; extremely slow&#8230;a big drop in performance.  So I decided to root it to get a little more millage out of it before my upgrade.  Mind you, I was waiting for the <a title="Thundebolt via Phonearena" href="http://www.phonearena.com/phones/HTC-ThunderBolt_id4985" target="_blank">Thunderbolt</a> to come out to replace it&#8230;but decided against upgrading for the time&#8230;another story I suppose.  I decided to use <a title="SuperOneClick" href="http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=803682" target="_blank">SuperOneClick </a>to root my phone, and damn it was simple.  Literally one click and it was done&#8230;but what can I do with this root?  Well, first thing was overclocking to see if I can get some more speed.  I overclocked it to 800MHz and really didn&#8217;t notice much of a difference besides the fact that I could now have a wireless hot-spot&#8230;oh and I could take screen shots now (why doesn&#8217;t Android have this functionality built in? Seriously!).</p>
<div id="attachment_410" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 178px"><a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/snap20110411_111101.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-410" title="Android Screen shot" src="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/snap20110411_111101-168x300.png" alt="Android Screen shot" width="168" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Hey look, I need to ROOT to take a screen shot!</p></div>
<p>So I decided to take it a step further.  My buddy was telling me about <a title="CyanogenMod" href="http://www.cyanogenmod.com/" target="_blank">CyanogenMod</a> and how he loved it on his MyTouch and basically brought life back into it.  So I said &#8220;Why the hell not?&#8221;  Not only does it add a lot of functionality, it will give me Android 2.3.3 (Gingerbread)&#8230;something the original DROIDs won&#8217;t ever see normally.  I backed-up my apps and text messages phone using <a title="MyBackup Root" href="https://market.android.com/details?id=com.rerware.android.MyBackupRoot" target="_blank">MyBackup Root</a> then flashed my recovery ROM to ClockworkMod which allows me to install firmware from the SD card and allows me to backup my entire phone to an image just in case anything goes wrong.  After the backup with MyBackup Root I rebooted into recovery mode and backed-up the entire phone using the Nandroid backup (in the recovery) then started to flash CyanogenMod 7 on my phone..this meant I had to do a complete wipe of the phone which is always scary but with the backup I should be cool!</p>
<p>Wiped the phone, flashed the ROM, and booted the phone. It worked! I had the Release Candidate (at the time it was RC1) of CyanogenMod 7 on my phone!</p>
<p>I had some issues with CM7 at first and some issues with getting my apps back (which I&#8217;ll talk about in Part 2) but after some initial bumps I was up running as smooth as I could be on a release candidate.  I had some reboots and some programs would crash but reinstalling them from scratch helped for the most part.</p>
<p>After a few updates it became more and more stable.  I am now running RC4 with a new ultra-low voltage kernel (which allows me to overclock to 1GHz and uses less battery power than the stock kernel). which gives me good battery life, pretty good performance, and all around a pretty good experience.</p>
<div id="attachment_411" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 178px"><a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/aboutPhone.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-411" title="About my DROID" src="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/aboutPhone-168x300.png" alt="" width="168" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Android 2.3.3 and 1.1GHz! </p></div>
<p>So if you&#8217;re looking to get some more time from your old DROID this seems like a great way to do it.  It&#8217;s not up there with the new phones, but it does give your device a nice little jolt until you decide to retire it.</p>
<p>In Part 2 I&#8217;ll talk about installing all of the apps from backup and troubleshooting the many issues I had with memory issues and how they were resolved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/getting-more-from-my-original-droid-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Stupid TUAW post: &#8220;Why I&#8217;m staying with AT&amp;T&#8221; and a moron too!</title>
		<link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/01/another-stupid-tuaw-post-why-im-staying-with-att/</link>
		<comments>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/01/another-stupid-tuaw-post-why-im-staying-with-att/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahlman IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearofthegeek.net/?p=392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I always enjoy reading tech blogs the day after a big announcement.  Not because I want to see coverage about the previous days event but because I I love seeing all of the weeping and moaning about what "failed" with said announcement (even though all of the expectations were rumors and speculation) and I like seeing the people who were so gung-ho about the event suddenly drop down and go back to their old crap.  I've seen the posts about the "failure" of the Verizon iPhone, and now I'm seeing the posts about "sticking with AT&#038;T."  Again, that's totally fine of course, don't switch companies for a single phone, but if you have various complaints and problems, isn't that enough to switch?

This post by Mel Martin on TUAW, The Unofficial Apple Weblog, really confused the hell out of me.  I saw the title "Why I'm Staying with AT&#038;T" and was expecting to see things like "I haven't had the issues everyone talks about," or "I like their customer service!" No, what I found was a long list of complaints with some reasons why he's sticking with AT&#038;T through all of his problems.  Let me break this down a bit more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always enjoy reading tech blogs the day after a big announcement.  Not because I want to see coverage about the previous days event but because I I love seeing all of the weeping and moaning about what &#8220;failed&#8221; with said announcement (even though all of the expectations were rumors and speculation) and I like seeing the people who were so gung-ho about the event suddenly drop down and go back to their old crap.  I&#8217;ve seen the posts about the &#8220;failure&#8221; of the Verizon iPhone, and now I&#8217;m seeing the posts about &#8220;sticking with AT&amp;T.&#8221;  Again, that&#8217;s totally fine of course; <a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/01/verizon-iphone-unicorns/">don&#8217;t switch companies for a single phone</a>, but if you have various complaints and problems, isn&#8217;t that enough to switch?</p>
<p>This <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2011/01/11/why-im-staying-with-atandt/" target="_blank">post</a> by Mel Martin on TUAW, The Unofficial Apple Weblog, really confused the hell out of me.  I saw the title &#8220;Why I&#8217;m Staying with AT&amp;T&#8221; and was expecting to see things like &#8220;I haven&#8217;t had the issues everyone talks about,&#8221; or &#8220;I like their customer service!&#8221; No, what I found was a long list of complaints with <strong>some</strong> reasons why he&#8217;s sticking with AT&amp;T through all of his problems.  Let me break this down a bit more.</p>
<blockquote><p>I admit, AT&amp;T has been sloppy and at times downright incompetent. Who can forget the massive foul up when the first iPhone came out and literally millions of customers couldn&#8217;t get AT&amp;T servers to sign them up? It happened again with the 3G iPhone and the iPhone 4.<br />
There&#8217;s the really nasty rate of dropped calls, lousy or inconsistent reception, and how AT&amp;T always seemed to put endless roadblocks before developers who wanted to use the iPhone in the way it was designed. Months of delays on the SlingPlayer app, no Wi-FI tethering, and more delays delivering a 3G tethering plan that was overpriced and forced you to give up your unlimited data plan. Oh yes, AT&amp;T dropped unlimited data so it could start enabling some of those features that might force you to go over AT&amp;T&#8217;s newly imposed limits. Nice. The list goes on and on.</p></blockquote>
<p>Let&#8217;s see.  That is a list of <strong>eleven</strong> complains or problems faced on AT&amp;T with the iPhone, not to mention that he put &#8220;the list goes on and on&#8221; at the very end, meaning there are<strong> more</strong> complaints!  Any normal, competent person would have tossed their provider out on their ass a long time ago with this list, I know I would have, but that&#8217;s because I actually like being able to make and receive calls and texts and data anywhere I like.  This is a VERY bad list of complaints for any cell service and sticking with someone this bad is just insane.</p>
<p>Now, with this list of <strong>eleven</strong> you figured there would be a much longer list of good reasons he&#8217;s straying with AT&amp;T, right? Let&#8217;s take a look now, one by one, and try to keep count!</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Big Fee to drop my AT&amp;T plan</strong>. Way too much. $325 for those who purchased after June 1, 2010, and $10 off of that for every month of completed contract.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is a good reason! Why would you want to pay a fee to drop your cell company only to have to pay another $200 to buy a new phone which you already own!  Let&#8217;s hope a trend of smart follows.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Coverage.</strong> We all know that AT&amp;T coverage is generally worse than Verizon, but AT&amp;T ponied up and let me have a <a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/learn/why/3gmicrocell/">MicroCell</a> device for free. It solves the &#8216;no coverage at home&#8217; problem, and after some initial growing pains it works well</p></blockquote>
<p>There goes the smart&#8230;out the window.  This is where I start getting very confused.  You&#8217;re claiming you want to stay with AT&amp;T because of their coverage but you say in the very next sentence that they generally have worse coverage than Verizon?  And because you had such bad service they gave you a personal 3g device to make calls in your home?  So you&#8217;re sticking with AT&amp;T because they have bad coverage but solved your home service issue?  Why bother have a cell phone then? Isn&#8217;t the point of a MOBILE PHONE to be able to use it&#8230;mobile-ly?</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Competition is good.</strong> I expect AT&amp;T to step up and compete, not because they want to, but because they have to. Maybe there will be a reinstatement of unlimited data plans. Maybe FaceTime will finally work on 3G.</p></blockquote>
<p>Another stupid point.  While I agree that because Verizon now has an iPhone that AT&amp;T will have to step it up, AT&amp;T has always had this problem and still haven&#8217;t resolved it for the most part.  Why would they all of a sudden just start to &#8220;compete&#8221; now?  Haven&#8217;t they been competing in the past, or were they just  riding the dollar waves of the Apple fanboys turning a blind eye to their crappy service just to have an iPhone?  Not to mention that you&#8217;re basing this on speculation that &#8220;maybe&#8221; something will happen.  I don&#8217;t know about you but when I&#8217;m paying for something now I want it to work now, not &#8220;maybe&#8221; in the future.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Simultaneous voice and data are huge.</strong> I often fire off an email or web link when I&#8217;m on the phone. Going to Verizon means I kiss all that goodbye.</p></blockquote>
<p>Okay, a valid reason to stay on AT&amp;T.  CDMA cannot do voice and data simultaneously and if that&#8217;s a big issue for you then you should have no questions to ask, just don&#8217;t switch. That&#8217;s two instances of sanity.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Speed.</strong> At least here in Arizona, I get really fast data on the iPhone. Yes, the Verizon voice network is more reliable, but in local side by side tests on the data side, my AT&amp;T phone really is faster than a Verizon smartphone.</p></blockquote>
<p>Speed is another thing that I have trouble viewing as a major issue to switch cell carries.  For one, the difference in speed isn&#8217;t really <em>that</em> much, unless you&#8217;re using 4G on a device.  Now, I would say that this is another good reason if you really <em>need </em>that speed, except for the fact that you point out AT&amp;T&#8217;s flaw right in the next statement.  You say AT&amp;T is faster than Verizon (true) but Verizon is more reliable.  Tell me, what&#8217;s more important to you: getting something done quickly while praying that you keep a steady connection, or getting something done <em>a little</em> slower, but knowing it&#8217;ll get done because you have a strong, reliable connection?  If you say anything other than the latter, you&#8217;re a moron.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>New iPhones. </strong>There will likely be a new iPhone this summer. I expect it will be a lot easier to talk AT&amp;T into an upgrade than Verizon.</p></blockquote>
<p>Guess what, you&#8217;re probably right! It really doesn&#8217;t take a genius to figure out Apple&#8217;s release schedule. But I also think that if someone wanted to upgrade early they will pony up the dough.  If they switched to Verizon and paid the fees they won&#8217;t have an issue upgrading their device.  Not to mention that so many people will probably wait for a new device before switching to Verizon anyway.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s the end of his list. Five reasons he&#8217;s staying, <strong>five</strong>. And only <strong>two</strong> of them are valid.</p>
<p>Explain that to me please: 11 complaints vs. 5 reasons (of which only 2 of them are valid in any way).  How can someone who apparently knows something about technology see this as a good decision?  If I had half the list of complaints this guy has, I&#8217;d drop Verizon like a bad habit.  I have maybe two complaints about Verizon and neither of them has anything to do with service or call quality (mainly cost and devices).  His entire post seems to me like he&#8217;s sucking the AT&amp;T pee pee all the way home while getting his free cell service too.</p>
<p>I should also point out that I have called TUAW out on a very <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2011/01/11/verizon-iphone-cant-handle-data-and-voice-simultaneously/" target="_blank">misleading title in one of their other posts</a> and they responded by sending me tweets to rumored stories about the iPhone 4G on Verizon.  It seems they do not understand the concept of a rumor.  Over there they seem to be a bunch of AT&amp;T and Apple fanboys&#8230;and dealing with fanboys is a hard thing to do.</p>
<p>Sound off in the comments if you have anything to say!</p>
<p><strong>Update note:</strong> I found <a href="http://systemsboy.com/2011/01/yay.html" target="_blank">this post on a blog</a> I frequent (The Adventures of Systems Boy!) and I was so happy to read it.  Three sentences and it&#8217;s already the best post on the Verizon iPhone. Thank you, Systems Boy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/01/another-stupid-tuaw-post-why-im-staying-with-att/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon iPhone: UNICORNS!!!!</title>
		<link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/01/verizon-iphone-unicorns/</link>
		<comments>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/01/verizon-iphone-unicorns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahlman IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VZW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearofthegeek.net/?p=380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, so it&#8217;s finally out, Verizon now has the iPhone.  And unicorns are flying around now apparently.  Of course the blogosphere and the media are insane right now but I have also seen my fair share of complaints and I laugh at a good amount of them.  Some of them even make me want to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so it&#8217;s finally out, Verizon now has the iPhone.  And unicorns are flying around now apparently.  Of course the blogosphere and the media are insane right now but I have also seen my fair share of complaints and I laugh at a good amount of them.  Some of them even make me want to slap someone. Let me go through them.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Not GSM, can&#8217;t use all over the world</strong>:  Okay, were you really expecting this? Verizon is CDMA, their phones work only in the US.  Yes, they offer world phones, but did anyone really believe they&#8217;d make a &#8220;world iPhone?&#8221;</li>
<li><strong>Not 4G/LTE</strong>: Apple will not update the iPhone in the middle of it&#8217;s life cycle to put 4G in the device.  Maybe the next one in July will have it, but expecting a 4G iPhone to come out today was really far-fetched.</li>
<li><strong>Can&#8217;t use data and voice simultaneously</strong>: Let me see. Anyone who would need this should know that CDMA cannot do this, it never has been able to and it never will.  Why the hell would anyone expect the iPhone to suddenly let CDMA do this?  It&#8217;s not about the phone people, it&#8217;s the network.  In my life, I have probably had the need to do this maybe 4 times, and I&#8217;m a tech junkie!  Maybe that&#8217;s me, but I still wonder how much people really need/care about this.</li>
<li><strong>Verizon might install apps on the phone</strong>: I don&#8217;t think Apple would allow this. They didn&#8217;t allow it on AT&amp;T&#8230;.why would they allow it for Verizon?  If they do, I&#8217;ll eat my shoe.</li>
</ul>
<p>So those are really the fun ones I&#8217;ve heard. I&#8217;m sure there is someone out there who always uses data and voice, but then stay with AT&amp;T! If you travel out of the country a lot, chances are you don&#8217;t have Verizon anyway. I believe that these complains are from people on AT&amp;T fed up with them and they were hoping Verizon would swoop in and save them from everything bad about AT&amp;T&#8230;and are disappointed that they can&#8217;t just get everything they want.  So a message; stop crying. You&#8217;re never going to get everything you want, face it.</p>
<h2>
<p><div id="attachment_387" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/iphoneUnicorn1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-387" title="iphoneUnicorn" src="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/iphoneUnicorn1-300x272.jpg" alt="Unicorn Power!" width="300" height="272" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">What everyone expected...</p></div></h2>
<h2>What will Happen Next?</h2>
<p>How many people are going to jump the AT&amp;T ship to go to Verizon now?  I know of a few off hand that will as soon as they can. Honestly, switching carriers for a phone is just ridiculous.  I always thought this, especially when everyone complained &#8220;Oh my god I can&#8217;t wait until the iPhone is on Verizon so I can finally dump AT&amp;T!&#8221;  My question, why bother have a cell phone on a network that doesn&#8217;t make you happy?  Isn&#8217;t the point of a cell phone to have cellular service?  If you switch providers simply for a phone, then that&#8217;s dumb.  Switch because one has the features you want, or because one&#8217;s cheaper, you know..a <em>good</em> reason.  If you&#8217;re going to leave AT&amp;T now because you had shitty service and were just waiting for an iPhone to come to a better network, that&#8217;s even a good reason..that&#8217;s probably why most people will leave, but don&#8217;t complain when you can&#8217;t use your voice and data at the same time since you switched, that&#8217;s your own dumb fault for not knowing you can&#8217;t do it.</p>
<p>I also wonder how many Verizon Android users will hop over to the iPhone.  I know this will happen (again, I already know of some people who are thinking of doing this), but I really want to see how many people will end up doing this.  I myself have thought, &#8220;Humm, if a Verizon iPhone came around, would I go for it?&#8221;  I do like the iPhone hardware and iOS is nice but I&#8217;m very happy with Android and I see very good Android devices coming out in the near future.  I&#8217;m also used to it&#8217;s features and I know I&#8217;d miss some of them if I went to the iPhone.  Only time will tell, but come August when I&#8217;m up for a new phone I hope to have a choice of some LTE Android phones or even an LTE iPhone.</p>
<p>Wrapping up, what does this change?  Nothing much.  People will still switch companies for a phone, and people will still not be happy with things they&#8217;ve wished for.  Not a single person will get everything they want from their phone or network, and that&#8217;s the way it will be forever.  I want a device that can work on CDMA and GSM and underground, but guess what? That&#8217;s not happening. Am I going to complain and call something I waited for a failure? No, because these are <em>my</em> wants, <em>my</em> needs.  Cell companies and device makers don&#8217;t have an obligation to anyone.  This iPhone hype was all created by the media.  All of these wishes were created by the media.  Verizon and Apple didn&#8217;t promise anybody anything, they simply said &#8220;we have an announcement&#8221; and that&#8217;s all it took for everyone to go ape shit and expect all of these things from the device, hell people didn&#8217;t even know it was actually an iPhone announcement until they said it.  It could have been a Windows Phone 7 announcement!  The fact of the matter is that you can&#8217;t always get what you want.  Listen to the Stones, people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/01/verizon-iphone-unicorns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T-Mobile, Big Red, Samsung, and Moto dump on the Open Handset Alliance</title>
		<link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/07/t-mobile-big-red-samsung-and-moto-dump-on-the-open-handset-alliance/</link>
		<comments>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/07/t-mobile-big-red-samsung-and-moto-dump-on-the-open-handset-alliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahlman IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearofthegeek.net/?p=356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me set the stage up for those who don&#8217;t know much background. In 2005, Android, Inc. (a small company in Cali) was acquired by Google. Android, Inc. was a start-up whose business was in developing software for mobile phones. In 2007 Google helped fund the Open handset Alliance (OHA) which is a consortium of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me set the stage up for those who don&#8217;t know much background.  In 2005, Android, Inc. (a small company in Cali) was acquired by Google.  Android, Inc. was a start-up whose business was in developing software for mobile phones.  In 2007 Google helped fund the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Handset_Alliance">Open handset Alliance</a> (OHA) which is a consortium of several technology companies whose purpose was to develop open standards for mobile devices.  Motorola, Samsung, and T-Mobile and among these companies.  These companies should all be first in line to make phones more open and free, right?</p>
<p>Well&#8230;</p>
<p>Yesterday&#8217;s <a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/07/the-droid-x-and-the-efuse-moto-shooting-themselves-in-the-foot/">post</a> has already shown us that Motorola should really rework some of their business practices, but it also puts them in a precarious position in the OHA by going against what the OHA is exactly trying to stop, carrier and corporate lockdown of mobile devices.  Some even think that because of the eFuse <a href="http://www.absolutelyandroid.com/why-motorola-should-be-asked-to-leave-the-open-handset-alliance/">Moto should be asked to leave the OHA</a>, and I&#8217;m not entirely sure that they&#8217;re wrong in asking this.  If they are supposed to abide by the OHA terms, they should. No deviations.</p>
<p>Now for another punch in the OHA/Android face, T-Mobile and Verizon are now <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2010/07/android-junkware.html">installing &#8220;junkware&#8221; in their new Android phones</a> that cannot be removed in most circumstances.  The LA Times blog is reporting that, &#8220;the Droid X comes loaded with several nonstandard applications for Google&#8217;s Android, most of which cannot be removed&#8221; and that T-Mobile&#8217;s new Samsung Vibrant is also loaded with some extra apps that cannot be removed.  What kind of apps are installed?  Here&#8217;s a few snips:</p>
<blockquote><p>Among the [Droid X's] so-called junkware is a Blockbuster video app and a demo for an Electronic Arts game called Need for Speed: Shift&#8230;.The EA racing game, which provides limited functionality and a large button on the introduction screen urging players to buy the full version, can be removed&#8230;</p>
<p>Skype, which is included with other Android handsets Verizon sells, is a permanent fixture, as is a utility called City ID. The latter program provides location information about phone numbers on the incoming call screen. But it works for only 15 days before asking users to pay $1.99 per month&#8230;</p>
<p>The T-Mobile Vibrant phone from Samsung, meanwhile, has four of these extra apps staring you in the face.</p>
<p>One is the movie &#8220;Avatar,&#8221; permanently loaded onto the device&#8230;Another is a live video channel called MobiTV &#8212; good for only 30 days. The third is a link to install an EA game called The Sims 3: Collector&#8217;s Edition. The last is an outdated version of Amazon&#8217;s Kindle app.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also Slacker Radio, which cannot be used before providing an e-mail address, and a button leading to Gogo Inflight Internet&#8217;s website, which includes a one-month trial for Web surfing (only on plans that provide the service).</p>
<p>Try as you might, none of these apps can be uninstalled.</p></blockquote>
<p>That is an awful lot of software to load onto a phone that runs an operating system that is supposed to be &#8220;free&#8221; and &#8220;open&#8221; for it&#8217;s users.  The fact that most of them cannot be uninstalled is the most enraging part.  I&#8217;m also sure that these apps take up a good deal of storage space.</p>
<p>Samsung, Motorola, Verizon, and T-Mobile are completely going against the principles of the OHA which they are all (with the exception of Verizon) a part of.  But I&#8217;d probably blame the carries more because in the end, they are the one&#8217;s with final say on what is loaded on their devices.</p>
<p>So, should all of them be asked to leave the OHA?  I&#8217;d say that if they continue this trend then yes.  The OHA should give them an ultimatum to stop and they should take it or leave.  If the OHA fails to even deliver on that then what is the point of the OHA?  If you&#8217;re not going to stand by one of your most basic principles then you have failed.</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t think this is worse than the eFuse in the Droid X, it certainly is something that needs to be resolved just as rapidly.  Putting a few small applications on a phone specific to your company is not really a problem, not allowing your customers to remove them is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/07/t-mobile-big-red-samsung-and-moto-dump-on-the-open-handset-alliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Droid X and the eFuse: Moto shooting themselves in the foot</title>
		<link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/07/the-droid-x-and-the-efuse-moto-shooting-themselves-in-the-foot/</link>
		<comments>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/07/the-droid-x-and-the-efuse-moto-shooting-themselves-in-the-foot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahlman IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VZW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearofthegeek.net/?p=347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year I bought my first smartphone, a Motorola DROID from Verizon. This is my first Moto phone since I got a RAZR many moons ago and swore off Moto forever because of their shitty product. Now, I love my DROID, it does everything I need it to do and more, and I really think [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year I bought my first smartphone, a Motorola DROID from Verizon.  This is my first Moto phone since I got a RAZR many moons ago and swore off Moto forever because of their shitty product.  Now, I love my DROID, it does everything I need it to do and more, and I really think Moto got it right with the DROID (I also applaud Big Red for finally making their phones more open).  Since the DROID came out Moto has yet to release another kick-ass Android-based phone; the CLIQ is a piece of junk so don&#8217;t say that.  Verizon has released the DROID Incredible (an HTC device) which is also making the rounds as being an amazing phone, but people were waiting for Moto&#8217;s next DROID.  The Droid X was to be the next amazing Verizon/Android/Moto Android phone but with its release something has popped up on the tech radar; the eFuse.</p>
<p>According to a source at <a href="http://www.mydroidworld.com/forums/droid-x-discussion/3330-how-droid-x-locked-down-let-me-tell-you-what-i-know.html">My Droid World</a> (and <a href="http://community.developer.motorola.com/t5/MOTODEV-Blog/Custom-ROMs-and-Motorola-s-Android-Handsets/bc-p/4290#M432title=Custom">Motorola themselves</a>), the Droid X has an eFuse chip installed in the device.  The long and short of it is that Motorola has installed this eFuse in the new Droid X which checks the phone for the proper kernel, boot-loader, and ROM and if the proper software is not found it will automatically &#8220;trip a fuse&#8221; to corrupt the phone&#8217;s boot-loader forcing you to get it repaired and will most likely void your warranty.  Oh and did I mention that the phone can ONLY be repaired by Motorola, so the Verizon Store won&#8217;t help you (well, they&#8217;ll ship it to them for you) and you&#8217;ll most likely end up pay for a new phone.</p>
<p>Why is Motorola doing this to their phones?  According to the Motorola blog:</p>
<blockquote><p>We understand there is a community of developers interested in going beyond Android application development and experimenting with Android system development and re-flashing phones.  For these developers, we highly recommend obtaining either a Google ADP1 developer phone or a Nexus One, both of which are intended for these purposes.  At this time, Motorola Android-based handsets are intended for use by consumers and Android application developers, and we have currently chosen not to go into the business of providing fully unlocked developer phones.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now if I read that correctly, Motorola just told people to buy an HTC device (the Nexus One or a Google ADP1 dev phone) and not their product because their &#8220;Android-based handsets are intended for use by consumers and Android application developers.&#8221;  So, the DROID was a fluke? Well&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>When we do deviate from our normal practice, such as we did with the DROID, there is a specific business reason for doing so.  We understand this can result in some confusion, and apologize for any frustration.</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re joking, right?  You deviated on the DROID for a &#8220;business reason&#8221; and now that everyone loves your Android-based phones, you&#8217;re going to change it?  How stupid does that sound?</p>
<p>First, if you&#8217;re going to say you have a reason you could at least tell the people what that reason was even if it&#8217;s most likely about money.  Secondly, why would you want to change something that has worked already?  You know the whole &#8220;no fix if no broke&#8221; thing?  The DROID was probably the best smartphone released last year because of it&#8217;s features and it&#8217;s openness.  Taking one of those key selling points away is really going to piss people off.  Also, not only is it frustrating, it&#8217;s just a punch right in the face of all the people who praised your phone for it&#8217;s openness.</p>
<p>What happens when (like the MyTouch 3g and G1, etc) the developers stop caring about a phone so much that they don&#8217;t release a new version of Android for it, when their phones are still capable of running them?  Or if Motorola decides not to update the SenseUI on the phone and you&#8217;re stuck with whatever they stop with?  Well, of course you&#8217;re supposed to buy another phone from them, but it probably won&#8217;t be a Moto phone if the eFuse is still there.  But there are a lot of people want to get all they can from their device (I mean, you did pay $200+ for it!).  So they&#8217;ll end up going the route of rooting a phone and installing a modded Android install and continue to be happy with your device.  Does it change that fact that it&#8217;s still a Motorola brand phone? No, it just shows that your hardware still kicks ass 2 years after it was released instead of going to the bottom of the old electronics drawer or whatever.</p>
<p>I realize not everyone cares about modding their phones, hell it&#8217;s most likely a larger portion than the people who do care, but the issue is that Motorola is making it okay for a company to brick YOUR phone if they don&#8217;t like what you do to it.  You know, the phone YOU paid for with YOUR money (which Motorola took of course!).  A lot of people buy devices based on how much the company lets you tinker with the device after you buy it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m almost positive that the phone will still be hacked, but this is going to cause a big backlash in the Android community against Motorola (and probably Verizon even though they most likely have nothing to do with it).  A lot of Android folk are very pro-open-source and while the software is still &#8220;open&#8221; the hardware will strike you down if you try to change it.</p>
<p>While I won&#8217;t tell people not to buy a Moto phone again I will say that the Droid X will probably be a bad choice if you&#8217;re going to alter the base software or if you want the phone to last a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/07/the-droid-x-and-the-efuse-moto-shooting-themselves-in-the-foot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TUAW&#8217;s iPhone 4.0 Wish List has Some Stupid Wishes</title>
		<link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/01/tuaws-iphone-4-0-wish-list-has-some-stupid-wishes/</link>
		<comments>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/01/tuaws-iphone-4-0-wish-list-has-some-stupid-wishes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahlman IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearofthegeek.net/?p=302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I came across this post on The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW).  I read through it and couldn&#8217;t help but laugh at some of the requests; not just because some are silly but because some phones already do this and iPhone users used to ask, &#8220;Why do I need that?!&#8221; I felt I should write [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I came across <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2010/01/10/dear-apple-what-we-want-to-see-for-iphone-4-0-part-1/#continued" target="_blank">this</a> post on The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW).  I read through it and couldn&#8217;t help but laugh at some of the requests; not just because some are silly but because some phones already do this and iPhone users used to ask, &#8220;Why do I need that?!&#8221; I felt I should write my opinions on these requests.  Mind you, I have never owned an iPhone, but I&#8217;ve witnessed countless people with them and have used them a good deal troubleshooting for people while at work, I also own an Android-powered DROID; just a disclaimer.</p>
<p>Before I even get into the list I come across this</p>
<blockquote><p><em>This is the first of a series of letters to Apple on your behalf, telling the gang in Cupertino what would make their wonder-phone even more wondrous</em></p></blockquote>
<p>And it even goes into a real letter to Apple.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Dear Apple,</em></p>
<p><em>While it&#8217;s clear the iPhone is the best smartphone on the market right now, you have a lot of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/nexus-one-review/">competition</a> creeping up. We want to help you blow them out of the water with the iPhone OS 4.0. Here are our suggestions:</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Now, if you know Apple AT ALL you know that they really don&#8217;t listen to the user. TUAW certainly knows this since they write about Apple all the time.  Apple&#8217;s idea of market research is &#8220;Steve said this was good, so it&#8217;s good.&#8221;  This isn&#8217;t always the case of course; they brought back firewire to all of their laptops after omitting it on most for a time, but Apple really isn&#8217;t going to listen to you all that much.  They will look at the market and see what other phones have that they missed, and probably include some of those.  For instance, people use removable-media on their devices a lot, some people prefer it over internal media of course.  Will Apple ever put a microSD card in their iPhone or iPod? Probably not.  Why?  Probably because it&#8217;s something else that could break that they don&#8217;t want to have to worry about, but it&#8217;s probably because they don&#8217;t want people to add more space to their devices without buying a whole new device.</p>
<p>Now to the list (please read the article if you&#8217;re going to ask questions or complain or whatever, I will only be posting the main idea of each item, not the description of the idea)</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>1. The lock screen needs to change</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>This one is nothing too crazy.  The lock screen could change of course to show more information; a list of to-do&#8217;s, emails, whatever.  So this one I really don&#8217;t have an issue with.  Other phones do this a bit; on Android you get your notifications with an icon in the top menu bar as well as a different colored blinking LED on the front of the phone.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>2. A new home screen. The iPhone is the smartest phone on the market. Make it smarter. Introduce a location-aware home screen.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>This is another one that I really don&#8217;t have an issue with.  I actually like this idea and wonder why more phones/devices don&#8217;t have it.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong> 3. That new home screen? Let us access it by vertically swiping.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>This one confused me a little bit. I can see the desire to have all of your feeds and shit within a simple swipe, but why?  Do something like Android and use a drop down menu at the top.  You select the top menu and slide it out, this way you don&#8217;t accidentally swipe vertically while you&#8217;re reading something and open your home screen. The mock-up looks nice:</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 187px"><a href="http://www.teehanlax.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/iphone_home_all1.jpg"><img title="iPhone Home mock-up" src="http://www.teehanlax.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/iphone_home_all1.jpg" alt="Mock-Up home screen for iPhone" width="177" height="340" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Credit: Teehan+Lax</p></div>
<p>But it reminds me of the drop down in Android, just more refined.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>4. Overhaul app navigation.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>This is another one I really like.  Tape the home button when on your app menu and it shows all of your homescreens in a nice &#8220;exposé&#8221; style manner.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7soM07Y3qNI">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7soM07Y3qNI</a></p>
</p>
<p>This should be standard too.  If hold my home button on my DROID it brings up my running programs and I can switch between them (more on multitasking later).</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>5. 85% of us want multitasking and 3rd party background apps</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>This is where I get a little annoyed with iPhone users.  Now, multitasking is something that the Palm Pre does with WebOS, as well as Android phones, but the iPhone falls short here.  It SHOULD have it, but iPhone users used to ask me &#8220;Who needs that?&#8221; or &#8220;Who cares about that?&#8221;  Well, apparently 85% of the people polled care about it enough to respond to TUAW.  This is a good demand&#8230;until I see the next line: &#8220;but not at the cost of battery life.&#8221; What? Really? You want to run multiple applications at once and not use battery life? What kind of engineering do you think Apple does?  Come on now, be realistic!</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>6. Almost 80% of us want Flash, even if it&#8217;s a bad idea.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Again, a pretty good request.  I want it on my DROID too.  Apparently it&#8217;ll be out for Android before the iPhone though.  Also, running Flash on anything MacOS related is a death sentence.  They realize this in the post, but I&#8217;m just throwing it in there also.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>7. We love that you introduced landscape mode across virtually all apps in iPhone OS 3.0, but 70% of us want the ability to selectively turn it off.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Okay, this really isn&#8217;t built into the phone?  Android has it built in already&#8230;why didn&#8217;t Apple?  I don&#8217;t know. But it&#8217;s actually a legit request also.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>8. When we leave an app, we want it to remember where we were.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>This one is part of the whole multitasking thing. When multitasking comes, this better be in it, or you&#8217;re doing it wrong! (Yes, Android for the most part has this, and I believe WebOS does as well.)</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>9. 65% of us want the ability to remove Apple-branded apps.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>This next one is a fair request, but it just won&#8217;t happen. Apple doesn&#8217;t care&#8230;really.  They don&#8217;t want you to remove their apps on the iPhone because, well, it&#8217;s their apps.  There are ways apparently to hid the app from your screen, but not to remove them. These apps are so small what should it matter? This is what you&#8217;re getting with a brand; the device and the apps to come with it.  Same on most devices.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>10. 60% of us want a universal &#8220;documents&#8221; folder.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Okay, fair again, but a question is why doesn&#8217;t it do this anyway? &#8220;We realize this breaks the sandboxing model that prevents one app from blowing away data belonging to another one, but we have every confidence you can make it work.&#8221; Yeah, and when an app comes out that removes all of your pictures and documents who are you going to blame for allowing this? Thought so.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>11. Better Support for Codecs and Add-ons</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>This one is basically asking to allow WMV and AVI stuff to run. I suppose this is another valid request. Next!</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>12. The iPhone is a hard drive with a screen, so&#8230;.</strong>[Give us Disk mode in the OS. 50% of us want to use our iPhone as an external USB/Wi-Fi hard drive.]</p></blockquote>
<p>One of my favorites. I wonder why Apple doesn&#8217;t allow this.  Maybe it&#8217;s because they don&#8217;t want people to be able to remove their apps so easily, or copy some over, or maybe it&#8217;s because they want their users to use iTunes.  You know, one of their most popular pieces of software.  It&#8217;s all about controlling the environment the phone runs with.  You can use other programs to add songs, and documents and pictures, but adding apps is all iTunes.  There is really no third party app vendor, is there? You&#8217;re stuck with iTunes, like it or not.</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s really my $.02 on this blog entry.  It&#8217;s probably biased, but it&#8217;s me being honest.  I like the iPhone.  I think it&#8217;s a great device, but it does have some stupid flaws that can easily be fixed (as well as being a shitty phone).  Unfortunately these requests might fall on deaf ears,  Steve Jobs is not going to listen much, he&#8217;s going to make you listen.</p>
<p>Fixing or adding any of these features to the iPhone will still not help if you&#8217;re sitting on a shitty network. I&#8217;ll keep m DROID and use an iPod Touch (or my 6th Gen iPod Classic).  I&#8217;ll at least be able to do everything I can on an iPhone while actually being able to make phone calls.<br />
There will most likely be a part 2 from this article, so I may just have to wager in on that one as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/01/tuaws-iphone-4-0-wish-list-has-some-stupid-wishes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cell Phone Fussing</title>
		<link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/01/cell-phone-fussing/</link>
		<comments>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/01/cell-phone-fussing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahlman IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DROID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VZW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearofthegeek.net/?p=287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love technology, obviously.  I love my computers, my iPod, my PSP, televisions, and I love my cell phone.  I&#8217;ve had a cellular phone since my junior year in high school around 2002.  My parents and I had a plan with Cingular (remember them?) and we used our phones in normal emergency cases or cases [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love technology, obviously.  I love my computers, my iPod, my PSP, televisions, and I love my cell phone.  I&#8217;ve had a cellular phone since my junior year in high school around 2002.  My parents and I had a plan with Cingular (remember them?) and we used our phones in normal emergency cases or cases where we needed to ask something ASAP.  Minutes were scarce, and texting was totally out of the question, it was $0.25/text or something, and texting on my original phone; a Nokia 5120, you remember&#8230;the phone that EVERYONE had, was a real pain anyway.</p>
<div id="attachment_288" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 260px"><a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/5120.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-288" title="Nokia 5120" src="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/5120.jpg" alt="The phone EVERYONE had" width="250" height="270" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Hi, remember me?</p></div>
<p>Finally in 2004 or so we got fed up with Cingular&#8217;s shitty service (me being in NY for school also made this easier as we needed some method of communication) and the lack of minutes, etc., I decided to drop my grandmothers Cingular plan (she got it for us) and pay for my own Verizon Wireless family plan.  It cost a bit more, but we got nice new LG vx4500s, 700 minutes, and a MUCH better network. It was a big step.  That was 5 1/2 years ago and after 5 different phones I&#8217;m still with <em>Big Red</em>.  I have come to upgrade many things with my plan and demand much more from them, but not much else has changed.</p>
<div id="attachment_290" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/vzwphones.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-290" title="vzwphones" src="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/vzwphones-300x100.png" alt="Verizon phone progression" width="300" height="100" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">My phones with verizon</p></div>
<p>There is a progression of my Verizon phones.  &#8220;But you said 5, that&#8217;s only 3!&#8221; You&#8217;re right, and I&#8217;m sure you knew I wasn&#8217;t going to write about my cell phones since 2002 without a reason, right?</p>
<p>Right.</p>
<p>In September I was eligible for a new phone on my &#8220;new every two&#8221; offer.  Psyched, I took to the interwebs and researched phones that I would love to have vibrate in my pocket when people decided to call me.  I looked far and wide, and read review after review of phones.  I went to the store and used the many phones offered, and used friends&#8217; phones as benchmarking.  I came to 2 conclusions while doing this:</p>
<ol>
<li>I wanted a phone with a <strong>touch screen. </strong>I don&#8217;t know why, I think it&#8217;s the &#8220;new thing&#8221; but I wanted a touch screen dammit.</li>
<li>I wanted a<strong> full QWERTY keyboard.</strong> I do a shit-ton of texting now, and this became mandatory now. I didn&#8217;t know if a software keyboard would be alright for me, so I wanted a REAL keyboard.</li>
</ol>
<p>With those in mind I nixed my previous idea of obtaining the LG Dare (a rather pretty touch screen phone, but NO keyboard) and instead opted for the new LG touch screen phone, the LG enV Touch (vx1100). I used the voyager for a little while from a friend, and I kinda liked it.  When I started to test out the enV Touch I wanted it badly.  It was everything I needed, beautiful screen, nice tactile keyboard, and even an HTML browser; which came in handy when I opted to get the unlimited data plan for it.</p>
<p>After using the phone for about a month I started noticing weird issues where the phone would turn itself off randomly, or reset to default screens or just not receive calls (it wouldn&#8217;t ring, it would just say I had a missed call). Verizon told me it was defective and sent me a new phone, free of charge of course, since it was still within 30 days from purchase.  The second phone was even worse!  It was to the point where I didn&#8217;t get ANY phone calls on it for days, and I would only text because that was truly the ONLY reliable means to contact me.  Mind you, when the phone worked it was actually a great phone and texting device. But I got fed up and called Verizon about it.</p>
<div id="attachment_292" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/verizon-lg-env-touch-phone-2.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-292" title="verizon-lg-env-touch-phone-2" src="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/verizon-lg-env-touch-phone-2-300x210.jpg" alt="enV Touch" width="300" height="210" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Fuck you enV Touch</p></div>
<p>Now here is the side note, during my time owning the phone, Verizon came out with the DROID, Motorola&#8217;s Android-based smart phone.  Reading reviews and playing with the system, I really really wanted this phone. I&#8217;ve become increasing interested in getting all of these mobile applications and using my phone for other things besides texting, calling, and occasionally searching Google for a place to eat. The issue was that I couldn&#8217;t upgrade because I just did, but if you have proper cause (which I&#8217;ll explain in a minute) you can get an early upgrade for your device without any penalty. I had to figure out a way to make my shitty phone turn into a DROID, and quickly.</p>
<p>I called Verizon and stated my issues about the phone.  I informed the woman that this was my second one in 2 months, and I do not want just a refurb that is going to end up doing the same damn thing.  I informed her that I have actually read reviews on THEIR OWN WEBSITE about people returning their phones 5 times in 3 months and still having the same issue. So I tell her I want a different phone, no bullshit.  Finally she tells me, &#8220;This falls under our 2 in 90 rule [or some shit].  If you return a phone 2 times the next time you return it you get a choice of a different phone from a matrix.&#8221;</p>
<div id="attachment_293" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Neo.phone_.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-293" title="Neo.phone" src="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Neo.phone_.jpg" alt="Neo" width="480" height="360" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Woah. Wat?</p></div>
<p>Apparently some phones can only allow you to get some other phones when you exchange them.  Usually these &#8220;matrix phones&#8221; are refurb or pre-used pieces of shit or other phones &#8220;similar&#8221; to the current one (like the LG Chocolate Touch).  I say &#8220;No, I want to choose my own phone like I was upgrading.&#8221; I inform the woman of my current status with them; I&#8217;m up-to-date on my payments, never missed a payment in 5 years, etc. After being on hold for a few moments the woman comes back and tells me that because of my continued loyalty to them they will give me a phone exchange for ANY phone they have at the store! All I have to do is pay the price difference of the phones and renew my 2-year contract.  Fine. Signed, sealed, done!</p>
<p>I arrive at my store and to my amazement, it&#8217;s not a phone exchange (meaning I&#8217;d have to give my enV touch back in exchange for the DROID) it&#8217;s an early upgrade.  I keep my enV Touch (which is not really a plus, but whatever) and get the DROID at the upgrade price.  After paying my $300 + taxes I walk out of the store with the DROID.</p>
<div id="attachment_294" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/53593811.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-294" title="DROID" src="http://yearofthegeek.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/53593811.jpg" alt="DROID" width="240" height="320" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">DROID, bitches!</p></div>
<h3>Review of the DROID (Kinda)</h3>
<p>So after having the phone for a bit now I&#8217;ve come to really love this phone more and more. Just a quick review (because this really isn&#8217;t a review blog) should suffice.</p>
<p>The screen on this phone is BEAUTIFUL.  It&#8217;s huge, bright, responsive, and just amazing. The Android interface is actually very intuitive and easy to work with.  The apps for it are pretty good; I wish some of them were a bit more refined with some things (the facebook app sometimes loads the browser for some things, which I think is a bit weird, but that&#8217;s not the phone&#8217;s fault, it&#8217;s the app).</p>
<p>It comes with a pre-installed 16GB microSD card.  This is enough space for plenty of apps and music and if you need more go buy a 32GB card! I love that it uses microSD as storage instead of non-removable internal storage.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s one of the few android phones with a real keyboard.  The keyboard is very flat, so it&#8217;s a bit tough to get used to typing on, but it functions very nicely.  Even when not using the real keyboard the virtual one is surprisingly responsive and easy to type on, much better than the one on the enV Touch.</p>
<p>One thing that surprised me was it&#8217;s <em>feel</em>. Yeah, the feeling of the phone.  What do I mean? It doesn&#8217;t feel like a piece of plastic that&#8217;s going to fall apart in your hand if you squeeze it. It&#8217;s heavy, sturdy, and just really solidly build.  You could probably bludgeon someone to death with it, that&#8217;s how it feels.</p>
<p>Its also a very quick phone.  Apps are pretty fast to load, websites load nicely (over wifi and Verizon&#8217;s network).  It doesn&#8217;t feel laggy that much at all.</p>
<p>I know there are a lot more things to talk about with this phone, but I&#8217;m not going to go into it too much.  I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll blog more about how much this thing kicks ass, and how much I prefer AndroidOS to the iPhone&#8217;s OS, but that&#8217;s going to be for later.</p>
<p>So, fuck the iPhone and AT&amp;T, give me my DROID!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/01/cell-phone-fussing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

